Testfall · A sample from open water without its depth, against a sample drawn from a reference flask
open-water-sample-without-depth
- Grupp
- regression-near-miss · Gruppversion 2
- Testsvit
- Testsvit controlled-regression, version 1
- Evidensklass
- REGRESSION
The engine reports a missing depth for a sample drawn from open water, and does not report one for a sample drawn from a reference flask, which the rule's trigger does not reach although the rule never names it.
Testdokumenten, reglerna och facit visas på engelska, det språk de skrevs på.
Vad det här testfallet ändrar
- Faktor
- where the sample was taken from
- Nivå
- open water
- Jämförs med
- tap-sampleÄndringen ska ändra svaret. Ett textställe i dokumentet skiljer sig mellan de två.
A sample drawn from the open water of the north basin, with no depth.
Dokumentet motorn fick
Exakt den text motorn fick, rad för rad.
- Sampling entry SA-062
- Purpose of sampling
- Water was sampled for the quarterly clarity check.
- Where the sample came from
- The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Dispatch of the sample
- The sample was sent for analysis the same afternoon.
Reglerna motorn fick
Varje regel visas under en neutral beteckning i stället för sitt interna namn.
Regel A
Depth of a sample drawn from open water
Källa: Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1
In a record, every sampling entry that reports a sample drawn from open water must also give the depth at which it was drawn. The duty rests on the author of the record.
Facit
Skrevs ner innan motorn kördes. open-water-sample-truth
A sample was drawn from open water and the depth the rule requires is absent.
Facit är uttömmande: varje fynd som inte står som förväntat räknas som fel.
Förväntade fynd
- BristUtelämnandeFynd sample-depth-absent
The entry reports a sample drawn from open water and gives no depth.
- Ska förankras i
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Ska hänvisa till
- Regel A
- Kontrolleras i
- granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten
Förbjudna fynd
Fel svar, nedskrivna i förväg.
- StyrkaFynd open-water-sample-praised-as-complete
Crediting the sample sentence for giving a depth when it gives none.
- Ska förankras i
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Ska hänvisa till
- Regel A
- Kontrolleras i
- granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten
Vad den blinda läsaren svarade
En AI-läsare fick det här dokumentet och dess regler, men inte facit, och svarade på egen hand. Jämför svaret med facit ovan.
- Överens med facitClaude, 5 oktober 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-02
- BristUtelämnandeRegel A
Ska förankras i
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Överens med facitGemini, 5 oktober 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-02
- BristUtelämnandeRegel A
Ska förankras i
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
Kritisk granskning av facit
En AI-modellsession försökte hitta fel i det här facit enligt ett publicerat protokoll: är varje väntat fynd verkligen ett brott mot regeln, är varje felfritt fall verkligen felfritt, prövar fallet det det säger sig pröva, och skulle ett lika riktigt svar som pekar på ett annat ställe räknas som fel. Den tittade inte på motorns resultat först. Varje invändning visas med hur den avgjordes. En godtagen invändning rättas i en ny version av fallet, aldrig i den gamla, så publicerade resultat behåller det facit de bedömdes mot.
Ingen kritisk granskning av det här facit finns registrerad.
Testets instruktion till granskaren
Testkonfigurationen gav AI-granskaren den här instruktionen vid sidan av reglerna. Det är testets egen instruktion. Produktionens systemprompt visas inte.
You read one document and apply only the rules supplied to you in the legal framework, exactly as each rule is written. Report every place where the document does not meet a supplied rule, and apply what a supplied rule says about how a record that meets it is to be recorded. Quote each passage exactly as it appears. Do not apply a rule that was not supplied, and do not rely on any knowledge of a legal system.Vem som skrev och läste det här testfallet
En AI-modellsession skrev de här testfallen, och en annan AI-modellsession läste dem blint utan att se facit. Ingen människa har granskat dem.
- Skrevs
- , registrerat som Claude Project thread session for #3076
- Modellfamilj som skrev det
- Claude
- Varför det skrevs
- Authored for #2323 as new REGRESSION material in the outcome shapes of the controlled-pilot suite, sharing none of its text. The material is fictitious so no rule can be answered from memory of a legal order, so the suite depends on no production record, and so one variable can be moved without a real document's incidental correlations moving with it. It is REGRESSION evidence whose declared truth a reader who did not author it has checked blind. Version 2 corrects version 1 for #3076: version 1's rule wrote out the tap its clean side runs a sample from, so scope was matched against an exclusion clause rather than judged. Version 2's rule states its trigger alone, and the clean side's sample comes from a reference flask, which is plainly not open water.
Granskning
Skrivna av en AI-modellsession: Claude.
Blind läsning, Claude, 5 oktober 2026: 1 av 2 överens
registrerat som Claude Project thread worker for #3076 (Claude Opus 5.5), blind read
Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall1 oenighet med facit
Punkt item-01
The reader agreed nothing is due for the sample drawn from a reference flask, but gave the reason as a condition not triggered; the key declares the sample out of the rule's scope.
Hur den avgjordes
Genuinely ambiguous, as on version 1's tap sample: the packet names the four reasons without defining them, and a rule whose reach is its trigger reads both as a scope limit and as an unmet condition. Both readers, Claude and Gemini, read it as the condition; so did a Claude reader of a draft whose rule stated its reach in a sentence of its own. The wording cannot settle it; the packet's definitions can. Kept as declared; #3083 defines the reasons.
Blind läsning, Gemini, 5 oktober 2026: 1 av 2 överens
registrerat som gemini-2.5-pro (Vertex europe-west1), blind read
Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall1 oenighet med facit
Punkt item-01
The reader agreed nothing is due for the sample drawn from a reference flask, but gave the reason as a condition not triggered; the key declares the sample out of the rule's scope.
Hur den avgjordes
Genuinely ambiguous, as on version 1's tap sample: the packet names the four reasons without defining them, and a rule whose reach is its trigger reads both as a scope limit and as an unmet condition. Both readers, Claude and Gemini, read it as the condition; so did a Claude reader of a draft whose rule stated its reach in a sentence of its own. The wording cannot settle it; the packet's definitions can. Kept as declared; #3083 defines the reasons.
AI-modeller skrev och granskade de här testfallen, som anges ovan. Ingen människa har granskat dem. Varje oenighet mellan en AI-granskare och facit publiceras här.
Fingeravtryck
SHA-256-hashvärden som en läsare kan jämföra med en publicerad körnings rapport.
- Dokument
- 4b6e1ba5981fa552334cbc9ade274b0261adc658b3317cb17099ed4f06f46865
- Dokumentmall
- 093b8e7c4ad697b18361c7126b1254d29148feaa047811246c02527c157762ed
- Regel A
- 49c365fd01cfc065fb6716bdd33a26cf382c86ad7c19ea77fe2f8d043ca8aebf
Resultat i publicerade körningar
Senaste först. Varje kolumn är en körning av det här testfallet.
Mätkörning med releasedesignen, ingen release,
Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången. Testfall Körning 1 Körning 2 Körning 3 Körning 4 Körning 5 Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning - sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
- sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
- sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
- sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
- sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
Se motorns egna svar
Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.
System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.
Körning 1
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document is a record containing sampling entry SA-062. It states under 'Where the sample came from' that 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the claim regarding open water sampling against the legal framework, Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (L1) governs records where an entry reports a sample drawn from open water. 3. EVALUATE: L1 mandates that 'every sampling entry that reports a sample drawn from open water must also give the depth at which it was drawn.' The document reports a sample drawn from open water but does not record the sampling depth anywhere in the entry. 4. SYNTHESIZE: This constitutes an omission on a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM), as the entry reports the open water sample but omits the mandatory depth specification required by L1.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Missing sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The sampling entry reports that the sample was drawn from open water but omits the depth at which the sample was drawn, failing to comply with the mandatory recording requirement under Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning 2
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document is a record containing 'Sampling entry SA-062'. It records under 'Purpose of sampling' that water was sampled for a quarterly clarity check, under 'Where the sample came from' that 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.', and under 'Dispatch of the sample' that it was sent for analysis. 2. TRACE: The claim that a water sample was drawn from open water is stated under the heading 'Where the sample came from'. No depth measurement or indication of depth is recorded for this sample. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (L1), every sampling entry in a record that reports a sample drawn from open water must also state the depth at which it was drawn. The sample is explicitly noted as being drawn from open water, yet the depth is omitted. 4. SYNTHESIZE: This constitutes a procedural omission on a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM), as the entry reports an open water sample but omits the mandatory depth requirement specified by binding law L1.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Missing sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The sampling entry reports a sample drawn from open water but fails to provide the depth at which the sample was drawn, contrary to the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning 3
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document is a record containing sampling entry SA-062. Under the heading 'Where the sample came from', the document states: 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.' 2. TRACE: The statement claims that a water sample was drawn from open water (the north basin). 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (L1), in a record, every sampling entry that reports a sample drawn from open water must also give the depth at which it was drawn. The document identifies the source as open water but omits the depth at which the sample was drawn. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry fails to comply with L1 because it reports an open water sample without specifying the sampling depth. This constitutes an omission on a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM).
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Incomplete sampling record
- Förklaring
- The record reports that a sample was drawn from open water but omits the required sampling depth mandated by Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning 4
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: Scanned the document 'Sampling entry SA-062'. The record documents a sampling event for a quarterly clarity check, stating that the sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin and dispatched the same afternoon. 2. TRACE: The document asserts under 'Where the sample came from' that 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.' However, nowhere in the record is the depth at which the sample was drawn specified. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (L1), in a record, every sampling entry that reports a sample drawn from open water must also give the depth at which it was drawn. The author of the record has failed to record the required depth for this open water sample. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulated a single flaw object identifying the omission of the sampling depth in the stated sampling claim under the section 'Where the sample came from', classified under STATED_CLAIM.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Omission of sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The record reports a sample drawn from open water but fails to specify the depth at which the sample was drawn, in violation of the requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning 5
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document is a record containing 'Sampling entry SA-062'. Under the section 'Where the sample came from', it states: 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.' Under 'Purpose of sampling', it states water was sampled for the quarterly clarity check. Under 'Dispatch of the sample', it states the sample was sent for analysis. 2. TRACE: Tracing the claim regarding open water sampling, the author explicitly identifies the origin of the sample as 'open water of the north basin'. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (L1), every sampling entry in a record that reports a sample drawn from open water must also give the depth at which it was drawn. The document records a sample drawn from open water but omits the required sampling depth. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry states a claim (sampling from open water) but omits a mandatory detail (depth). This constitutes an omission of the STATED_CLAIM variety under L1.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Incomplete sampling record
- Förklaring
- The sampling entry reports that a sample was drawn from open water but fails to provide the depth at which the sample was drawn, contrary to the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Schemalagd nattkörning,
Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången. Testfall Körning 1 Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren - sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
Se motorns egna svar
Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.
System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.
Körning 1
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document is a record entitled 'Sampling entry SA-062'. It records the purpose ('Water was sampled for the quarterly clarity check.'), location ('The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.'), and dispatch ('The sample was sent for analysis the same afternoon.'). 2. TRACE: The statement 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.' establishes that the entry reports a sample drawn from open water. 3. EVALUATE: According to the binding law (Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1; L1), every sampling entry in a record that reports a sample drawn from open water must state the depth at which it was drawn. The document states that the sample was drawn from open water but completely omits the sampling depth. Because the document states the claim of open water sampling but omits the required detail/depth, this constitutes an omission under the STATED_CLAIM evidence type. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate the flaw citing L1.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Omission of sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The record documents a sample drawn from open water but fails to specify the depth at which it was drawn, contrary to the mandatory requirement set forth in Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Schemalagd nattkörning,
Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången. Testfall Körning 1 Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren - sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
Se motorns egna svar
Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.
System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.
Körning 1
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document contains a sampling record (SA-062) detailing the purpose of sampling ('Water was sampled for the quarterly clarity check.'), the location where the sample was obtained ('The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.'), and the dispatch of the sample ('The sample was sent for analysis the same afternoon.'). 2. TRACE: The statement 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.' establishes that the sample was drawn from open water. 3. EVALUATE: Under the provided legal framework (Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 / L1), every sampling entry in a record reporting a sample drawn from open water must also specify the depth at which it was drawn. While the entry reports a sample drawn from open water, it omits the required sampling depth. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw for the omission of sampling depth in the open water sampling entry under L1.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Omission of sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The sampling entry reports a sample drawn from open water but omits the depth at which the sample was drawn, which is required by Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning efter en ändring i motorn,
Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången. Testfall Körning 1 Körning 2 Körning 3 Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning - sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
- sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
- sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
Se motorns egna svar
Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.
System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.
Körning 1
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document is a sampling entry record (SA-062). It details the purpose of sampling ('Water was sampled for the quarterly clarity check.'), the origin of the sample ('The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.'), and the dispatch details ('The sample was sent for analysis the same afternoon.'). 2. TRACE: The statement 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.' establishes that the sample was drawn from open water. Under the relevant legal framework, Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 imposes an explicit duty on the author of the record for every sampling entry reporting a sample drawn from open water to record the depth at which it was drawn. 3. EVALUATE: While the record specifies that the sample came from open water ('the open water of the north basin'), it fails to state the depth at which the sample was taken. This constitutes a direct violation of the mandatory duty in Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate the identified flaw as an omission with stated claim evidence, quoting the statement establishing open water sampling while identifying the omitted depth requirement.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Missing sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The sampling entry reports that the sample was drawn from open water but fails to give the depth at which it was drawn, contrary to the mandatory duty resting on the author of the record under Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning 2
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document is a record containing 'Sampling entry SA-062' with three sections: 'Purpose of sampling' ('Water was sampled for the quarterly clarity check.'), 'Where the sample came from' ('The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.'), and 'Dispatch of the sample' ('The sample was sent for analysis the same afternoon.'). 2. TRACE: Under 'Where the sample came from', the entry states: 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.' This establishes that the sample was drawn from open water. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (L1), every sampling entry in a record reporting a sample drawn from open water must state the depth at which it was drawn. The document records an open water sample but omits the depth. 4. SYNTHESIZE: This constitutes an omission on a stated claim (omission_evidence: STATED_CLAIM) under the heading 'Where the sample came from', violating Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Omission of sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The record reports a sample drawn from open water but does not state the depth at which the sample was drawn, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning 3
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: Scan the document for all sampling claims, entries, and contextual details. The text comprises sampling entry SA-062, stating the purpose ('Water was sampled for the quarterly clarity check.'), the origin ('The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.'), and dispatch details ('The sample was sent for analysis the same afternoon.'). 2. TRACE: Trace the claim regarding open water sampling back to the section 'Where the sample came from', which establishes that a sample was drawn from open water. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluate the entry against binding law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1). L1 requires that every sampling entry in a record that reports a sample drawn from open water must state the depth at which it was drawn. The document explicitly reports a sample drawn from open water ('The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.') but fails to state the sampling depth. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Identify the failure to state sampling depth as a legal/procedural omission under STATED_CLAIM.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Omission of required sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The record reports that a sample was drawn from open water but fails to state the depth at which the sample was drawn, contrary to Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning efter en ändring i motorn,
Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången. Testfall Körning 1 Körning 2 Körning 3 Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning - sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
- sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
- sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
Se motorns egna svar
Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.
System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.
Körning 1
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document is a record containing a sampling entry (SA-062). It reports: 'Water was sampled for the quarterly clarity check.', 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.', and 'The sample was sent for analysis the same afternoon.' 2. TRACE: The statement 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.' establishes that the sample was drawn from open water. 3. EVALUATE: According to Law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1), in a record, every sampling entry reporting a sample drawn from open water must also state the depth at which it was drawn. The document records a sample drawn from open water but omits the depth entirely. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate an omission flaw citing Law L1 for the missing depth in the sampling record.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Omission of required detail
- Förklaring
- The record reports that a sample was drawn from open water but fails to specify the depth at which it was drawn, contrary to Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning 2
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document contains sampling entry SA-062, which notes: 'Water was sampled for the quarterly clarity check.', 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.', and 'The sample was sent for analysis the same afternoon.' 2. TRACE: The entry documents a water sample drawn specifically from 'the open water of the north basin'. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (L1), every sampling entry in a record that reports a sample drawn from open water must state the depth at which it was drawn. The document states that the sample was drawn from open water but completely omits the sampling depth. 4. SYNTHESIZE: This constitutes an omission of a mandatory detail required for open water sampling entries under L1. The statement reporting the open water sample is quoted as the basis for the omission.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Omission of sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The sampling entry reports a sample drawn from open water but does not specify the depth at which it was drawn, contrary to Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning 3
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: Scanned the document for all statements and procedural entries. Under heading 'Where the sample came from', the document states: 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.' 2. TRACE: Traced the entry to determine that it documents a sample taken from open water. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated the entry against Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (Depth of a sample drawn from open water) [L1], which mandates that every sampling entry in a record reporting a sample drawn from open water must state the depth at which the sample was drawn. The record fails to provide the required depth. 4. SYNTHESIZE: An omission flaw is identified for failing to specify the sampling depth for an open water sample.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Missing sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The record documents a sample drawn from open water but fails to specify the depth at which the sample was drawn, contrary to Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (Depth of a sample drawn from open water).
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning efter en ändring i motorn,
Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången. Testfall Körning 1 Körning 2 Körning 3 Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning - sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
- sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
- sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
Se motorns egna svar
Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.
System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.
Körning 1
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document contains a record entitled 'Sampling entry SA-062'. Under the section 'Where the sample came from', it states: 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.' 2. TRACE: The claim reports an open-water sample drawn from the north basin for a quarterly clarity check, dispatched the same afternoon. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (L1), in a record, every sampling entry that reports a sample drawn from open water must also state the depth at which it was drawn. The record explicitly documents a sample drawn from open water but completely omits the sampling depth. 4. SYNTHESIZE: This constitutes an omission of a mandatory detail required by L1 for an open-water sampling entry.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Omission of sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The sampling entry reports that a sample was drawn from open water but does not state the depth at which the sample was drawn, failing to comply with Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the section heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning 2
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document is a sampling entry record (SA-062) detailing the purpose, origin, and dispatch of a water sample. Under 'Where the sample came from', it states: 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the claim regarding the sample source, it explicitly documents a sample drawn from open water. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (L1), in a record, every sampling entry reporting a sample drawn from open water must specify the depth at which it was drawn. The text identifies the source as open water but omits the required sampling depth. 4. SYNTHESIZE: A procedural omission exists regarding the required recording of sampling depth for open water samples.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Missing required sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The sampling entry reports a sample drawn from open water ('The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.') but omits the depth at which the sample was drawn, contrary to Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1, which requires every sampling entry in a record that reports a sample drawn from open water to state the depth at which it was drawn.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
Sida: Throughout - Utelämnande
- Ja
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning 3
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: Scanned the document for all statements, claims, and procedural entries. The document contains three statements under three headings: (a) under 'Purpose of sampling', 'Water was sampled for the quarterly clarity check.'; (b) under 'Where the sample came from', 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.'; and (c) under 'Dispatch of the sample', 'The sample was sent for analysis the same afternoon.' 2. TRACE: Traced the entry under 'Where the sample came from' ('The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.'). This confirms that the record explicitly documents a sample taken from open water. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated the entry against the provided binding law L1 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1'). L1 mandates that in a record, every sampling entry reporting a sample drawn from open water must state the depth at which the sample was drawn. The document states that the sample was drawn from open water but does not record the depth. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Synthesized the finding as an omission of a mandatory detail for an open-water sample under L1. The quote identifying the relevant claim is 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.' under heading 'Where the sample came from'.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Omission of sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The sampling entry reports that the sample was drawn from open water but does not specify the depth at which it was drawn, contrary to the requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning efter en ändring i motorn,
Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången. Testfall Körning 1 Körning 2 Körning 3 Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren2 olika uppsättningar fynd över körningarna - sample-depth-absent Brist: inte hittad, men regeln nämndes i ett annat fynd
1 oväntad brist
- Hänvisade till: Regel A
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
- sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
- sample-depth-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
Vad varierade mellan körningarna
Fynd som vissa körningar gav och andra inte. Varje länk går till motorns svar i den körningen.
Endast granskaren
Se motorns egna svar
Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.
System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.
Körning 1
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document is a record containing sampling entry SA-062. It records the purpose of sampling, specifies that 'The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin' under the heading 'Where the sample came from', and notes the dispatch of the sample. 2. TRACE: The entry documents a sample drawn from open water. The source text does not mention or record any sampling depth. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (Depth of a sample drawn from open water) (id: L1), in a record, every sampling entry that reports a sample drawn from open water must also give the depth at which it was drawn. The document fails to state the depth at which the open water sample was taken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate an omission flaw under L1 for the missing sample depth. No strengths or norm conflicts are present.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Omission of required information
- Förklaring
- The sampling entry reports a sample drawn from open water but fails to provide the depth at which it was drawn, contrary to the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
- Inget citat
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
Sida: Throughout - Utelämnande
- Ja
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning 2
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: Identify all causal claims, factual conclusions, and diagnostic statements made by the investigator in the text. The document comprises sampling entry SA-062 with sections for 'Purpose of sampling' ('Water was sampled for the quarterly clarity check.'), 'Where the sample came from' ('The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.'), and 'Dispatch of the sample' ('The sample was sent for analysis the same afternoon.'). 2. TRACE: Trace each claim's origin backward to verify foundation. The entry specifies that a sample was drawn from open water ('the open water of the north basin'). 3. EVALUATE: Compare the traced claims against the legal framework. Law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1) imposes an explicit duty on the author of a record that every sampling entry reporting a sample drawn from open water must state the depth at which it was drawn. The document reports an open water sample but omits any specification of depth. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate findings. The text exhibits a procedural/statutory omission under section 'Where the sample came from' by not stating the depth of the sample drawn from open water.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Missing sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The sampling entry reports that a sample was drawn from open water but omits the depth at which it was drawn, in violation of Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1, which requires every sampling entry in a record reporting a sample drawn from open water to state the depth.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Körning 3
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document contains a record entry (Sampling entry SA-062) detailing water sampling for a quarterly clarity check, stating that the sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin, and that it was dispatched the same afternoon. 2. TRACE: The claim/report that water was sampled from open water is located under the heading 'Where the sample came from' ('The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.'). 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (id: L1), in a record, every sampling entry that reports a sample drawn from open water must also give the depth at which it was drawn. The document records a sample drawn from open water in the north basin, but fails to state the depth at which the sample was drawn. 4. SYNTHESIZE: There is an omission of mandatory information required by binding law L1. No other legal rules or guidelines are provided, and no specific compliance matching a provided snippet can be cited as a legal strength.
1 brist rapporterad
- Kategori
- Omission of sampling depth
- Förklaring
- The sampling entry reports a sample drawn from open water but fails to specify the depth at which the sample was drawn, in violation of Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1.
- Citat
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Var
- Under the heading Where the sample came fromCiterad rubrik:
Where the sample came from
- Utelämnande
- Ja
- Åberopad regel
- L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1 (STATUTE)
0 styrkor rapporterade
Kontroll: motorn körd med fel regler
Visas skild från resultaten. Motorn fick ett annat falls regler, så varje fynd nedan är ett fynd mot regler som inte gäller det här dokumentet.
Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången. Testfall Körning 1 Bedömt mot version 2Endast granskaren - sample-depth-absent Brist: missad
Inga fynd utöver facit
Inget förbjudet fynd
Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
Se motorns egna svar
Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.
System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.
Körning 1
Språk som motorn angav: English
Motorns resonemang
1. SCAN: The document contains a sampling record ('Sampling entry SA-062') noting the purpose of sampling ('Water was sampled for the quarterly clarity check.'), location ('The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.'), and dispatch details ('The sample was sent for analysis the same afternoon.'). No levy entries, financial charges, or numerical figures establishing charges are present. 2. TRACE: Tracing the contents against the provided legal rule shows no financial or levy assessments. 3. EVALUATE: The single applicable rule in the legal framework, Law L1 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part P, issue 1'), stipulates that in a record, every levy entry that sets a charge from a figure must name the document from which the figure was read. Because the document contains no levy entry or charge derived from a figure, the requirement of L1 is not triggered. 4. SYNTHESIZE: There are no deviations from or non-compliances with the provided legal framework, nor are there specific procedures governed by L1 performed to record as legal strengths.
0 brister rapporterade
0 styrkor rapporterade
Tidigare versioner av det här testfallet
En rättad grupp publiceras bredvid den version som tidigare resultat bedömdes mot.
Gruppversion 1
Vad det här testfallet ändrar
- Faktor
- where the sample was taken from
- Nivå
- open water
- Jämförs med
- tap-sampleÄndringen ska ändra svaret. Ett textställe i dokumentet skiljer sig mellan de två.
A sample drawn from the open water of the north basin, with no depth.
Dokumentet motorn fick
Exakt den text motorn fick, rad för rad.
- Sampling entry SA-062
- Purpose of sampling
- Water was sampled for the quarterly clarity check.
- Where the sample came from
- The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Dispatch of the sample
- The sample was sent for analysis the same afternoon.
Reglerna motorn fick
Varje regel visas under en neutral beteckning i stället för sitt interna namn.
Regel A
Depth of a sample drawn from open water
Källa: Entry Practice Schedule, part N, issue 1
In a record, every sampling entry that reports a sample drawn from open water must also give the depth at which it was drawn. The duty reaches samples from open water only, and not samples run from a tap. The duty rests on the author of the record.
Facit
Skrevs ner innan motorn kördes. open-water-sample-truth
A sample was drawn from open water and the depth the rule requires is absent.
Facit är uttömmande: varje fynd som inte står som förväntat räknas som fel.
Förväntade fynd
- BristUtelämnandeFynd sample-depth-absent
The entry reports a sample drawn from open water and gives no depth.
- Ska förankras i
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Ska hänvisa till
- Regel A
- Kontrolleras i
- granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten
Förbjudna fynd
Fel svar, nedskrivna i förväg.
- StyrkaFynd open-water-sample-praised-as-complete
Crediting the sample sentence for giving a depth when it gives none.
- Ska förankras i
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Ska hänvisa till
- Regel A
- Kontrolleras i
- granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten
Vad den blinda läsaren svarade
En AI-läsare fick det här dokumentet och dess regler, men inte facit, och svarade på egen hand. Jämför svaret med facit ovan.
- Överens med facitClaude, 23 september 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-06
- BristUtelämnandeRegel A
Ska förankras i
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
- Överens med facitGemini, 4 oktober 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-03
- BristUtelämnandeRegel A
Ska förankras i
The sample was drawn from the open water of the north basin.
Kritisk granskning av facit
En AI-modellsession försökte hitta fel i det här facit enligt ett publicerat protokoll: är varje väntat fynd verkligen ett brott mot regeln, är varje felfritt fall verkligen felfritt, prövar fallet det det säger sig pröva, och skulle ett lika riktigt svar som pekar på ett annat ställe räknas som fel. Den tittade inte på motorns resultat först. Varje invändning visas med hur den avgjordes. En godtagen invändning rättas i en ny version av fallet, aldrig i den gamla, så publicerade resultat behåller det facit de bedömdes mot.
Granskning av Claude, 4 oktober 2026
- Invändning besvaradRiktighetRegel Ap2 · sample-depth-absent
Is "the open water of the north basin" open water, or a basin a reader might take for a tank?
Facit står kvar
The document says open water in so many words, and rule A uses the same words. The flaw is a breach of rule A as written.
- Invändning besvaradSvårighetRegel Ap3 · sample-source
Gäller hela gruppen av fall
The flawed side's "drawn from the open water" repeats rule A's "drawn from open water", so the trigger can be found by phrase.
Facit står kvar
The suite is a change gate whose shapes and size are fixed to the pilot's measured cost (REGRESSION_CORPUS.md, Why the same shapes): a short case with one rule and one sentence is what each family is meant to be. Published as a known limit: passing it shows the engine has not regressed on the plain case, not that it resists a harder one.
Testets instruktion till granskaren
Testkonfigurationen gav AI-granskaren den här instruktionen vid sidan av reglerna. Det är testets egen instruktion. Produktionens systemprompt visas inte.
You read one document and apply only the rules supplied to you in the legal framework, exactly as each rule is written. Report every place where the document does not meet a supplied rule, and apply what a supplied rule says about how a record that meets it is to be recorded. Quote each passage exactly as it appears. Do not apply a rule that was not supplied, and do not rely on any knowledge of a legal system.Vem som skrev och läste det här testfallet
En AI-modellsession skrev de här testfallen, och en annan AI-modellsession läste dem blint utan att se facit. Ingen människa har granskat dem.
- Skrevs
- , registrerat som Verkstaden implementer (Claude Local), #2323
- Modellfamilj som skrev det
- Claude
- Varför det skrevs
- Authored for #2323 as new REGRESSION material in the outcome shapes of the controlled-pilot suite, sharing none of its text. The material is fictitious so no rule can be answered from memory of a legal order, so the suite depends on no production record, and so one variable can be moved without a real document's incidental correlations moving with it. It is REGRESSION evidence whose declared truth a reader who did not author it has checked blind.
Granskning
Skrivna av en AI-modellsession: Claude.
Blind läsning, Claude, 23 september 2026: 22 av 22 överens
registrerat som Verkstaden orchestrator session (Claude Opus 5.5), blind read
Ingen oenighet med facit.
Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfallBlind läsning, Gemini, 4 oktober 2026: 19 av 22 överens
registrerat som gemini-2.5-pro (Vertex europe-west1), blind read
Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall3 oenigheter med facit
Punkt item-06
The reader found the closure entry's missing statement of where its papers are stored, as declared, but placed it under the "Closing note" heading; the key places it under no section.
Hur den avgjordes
Genuinely ambiguous: the rule attaches the duty to the whole entry, but a closing note is a natural home for it, and the packet does not say which. Kept as declared; #3082 sharpens the case.
Punkt item-07
The reader agreed nothing is due for the sample run from a tap, but gave the reason as a condition not triggered; the key declares the sample out of the rule's scope.
Hur den avgjordes
Genuinely ambiguous: the packet names the four reasons without defining them, and the rule's wording reads both as a scope limit and as an unmet condition. Kept as declared; #3083 sharpens the reasons.
Punkt item-17
The reader found the levy charged from a figure with no named document, as declared, but quoted the sentence that sets the levy; the key anchors the flaw on the sentence that states the figure.
Hur den avgjordes
Reader wrong: the rule's duty attaches to the figure ("a figure whose document is not named"), and the packet anchors an unsupported claim on the claim itself, which here is the figure, not the charge set from it.
Kritisk granskning, Claude, 4 oktober 2026: 1 invändning
registrerat som Claude Project thread session for #3049, adversarial critique
1 oenighet med facit
Punkt p1 (tap-sample, tap-sample-truth)
KEY_WEAK, VALIDITY: Rule A ends "The duty reaches samples from open water only, and not samples run from a tap." The out-of-scope document says "The sample was run from the tap in the pump house." The near miss is settled by matching the document against an exclusion the rule writes out word for word, so the case tests reading an exception clause, not the scope discrimination its hypothesis and its scope-discrimination tag claim.
Hur den avgjordes
ACCEPTED: The key is right, but the case does not test what it claims. The family is corrected under a new version whose rule states its scope by its trigger alone, over a source no careful reader could call open water. Follow-up #3076.
AI-modeller skrev och granskade de här testfallen, som anges ovan. Ingen människa har granskat dem. Varje oenighet mellan en AI-granskare och facit publiceras här.
Fingeravtryck
SHA-256-hashvärden som en läsare kan jämföra med en publicerad körnings rapport.
- Dokument
- 4b6e1ba5981fa552334cbc9ade274b0261adc658b3317cb17099ed4f06f46865
- Dokumentmall
- 093b8e7c4ad697b18361c7126b1254d29148feaa047811246c02527c157762ed
- Regel A
- 49c365fd01cfc065fb6716bdd33a26cf382c86ad7c19ea77fe2f8d043ca8aebf