GRANSKA
Logga inSkapa konto
Alla testfall

Testfall · The same entry read against one rule, and against that rule plus one it cannot offend

move-rule-only

Grupp
regression-irrelevant-rule · Gruppversion 1
Testsvit
Testsvit controlled-regression, version 1
Evidensklass
REGRESSION

Adding a rule the document cannot offend leaves the engine's structured result unchanged.

Testdokumenten, reglerna och facit visas på engelska, det språk de skrevs på.

Vad det här testfallet ändrar

Faktor
a rule the document cannot offend
Nivå
not supplied
Jämförs med
move-rule-with-tow-line-ruleÄndringen får inte ändra svaret. Reglerna som ges skiljer sig mellan de två.

The entry read against the move rule alone.

Dokumentet motorn fick

Exakt den text motorn fick, rad för rad.

  1. Berthing entry BE-019
  2. Movement between berths
  3. The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
  4. Crew arrangements
  5. The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.
  6. Berth status
  7. The inner berth is recorded as free.

Reglerna motorn fick

Varje regel visas under en neutral beteckning i stället för sitt interna namn.

  • Regel A

    Who ordered a vessel moved

    Källa: Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1

    In a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move. The duty rests on the author of the record.

Facit

Skrevs ner innan motorn kördes. move-order-unnamed-truth

The entry names nobody who ordered the move, which offends the first rule once. Exhaustive truth, so any finding drawn from the added rule counts as unexpected.

Facit är uttömmande: varje fynd som inte står som förväntat räknas som fel.

Förväntade fynd

  • BristUtelämnandeFynd move-without-ordering-person

    The entry says the dredger was moved and names nobody who ordered the move.

    Ska förankras i
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Ska hänvisa till
    Regel A
    Kontrolleras i
    granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten

Förbjudna fynd

Fel svar, nedskrivna i förväg.

  • StyrkaFynd move-praised-as-ordered

    Crediting the move sentence for naming who ordered it when it names nobody.

    Ska förankras i
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Ska hänvisa till
    Regel A
    Kontrolleras i
    granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten

Vad den blinda läsaren svarade

En AI-läsare fick det här dokumentet och dess regler, men inte facit, och svarade på egen hand. Jämför svaret med facit ovan.

  • Överens med facitClaude, 23 september 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-10
    • BristUtelämnandeRegel A

      Ska förankras i The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.

  • Överens med facitGemini, 4 oktober 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-12
    • BristUtelämnandeRegel A

      Ska förankras i The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.

Kritisk granskning av facit

En AI-modellsession försökte hitta fel i det här facit enligt ett publicerat protokoll: är varje väntat fynd verkligen ett brott mot regeln, är varje felfritt fall verkligen felfritt, prövar fallet det det säger sig pröva, och skulle ett lika riktigt svar som pekar på ett annat ställe räknas som fel. Den tittade inte på motorns resultat först. Varje invändning visas med hur den avgjordes. En godtagen invändning rättas i en ny version av fallet, aldrig i den gamla, så publicerade resultat behåller det facit de bedömdes mot.

Granskning av Claude, 4 oktober 2026

  • Invändning besvaradSvårighetRegel ARegel Bp1 · tow-line-rule-added

    Gäller hela gruppen av fall

    Rule B is triggered by a mention of a tow line, and the entry contains none, so the distractor can be dismissed by searching for the words. A distractor whose trigger is nearly met would be harder.

    Facit står kvar

    Rule B is near in subject (a dredger moved between berths is commonly moved under tow) and shares rule A's source label, so neither its topic nor its citation marks it as foreign. The hypothesis claims only that a rule the document cannot offend changes nothing, and that is what the pair tests.

  • Invändning besvaradGiltighetRegel ARegel Bp2 · tow-line-rule-added

    Gäller hela gruppen av fall

    Does the invariant pair change only the rule selection?

    Facit står kvar

    Both variants render the same bytes (one rendered SHA-256) and share one answer key; only the supplied rules differ, with rule B under the same authority type and source as rule A.

Testets instruktion till granskaren

Testkonfigurationen gav AI-granskaren den här instruktionen vid sidan av reglerna. Det är testets egen instruktion. Produktionens systemprompt visas inte.

You read one document and apply only the rules supplied to you in the legal framework, exactly as each rule is written. Report every place where the document does not meet a supplied rule, and apply what a supplied rule says about how a record that meets it is to be recorded. Quote each passage exactly as it appears. Do not apply a rule that was not supplied, and do not rely on any knowledge of a legal system.

Vem som skrev och läste det här testfallet

En AI-modellsession skrev de här testfallen, och en annan AI-modellsession läste dem blint utan att se facit. Ingen människa har granskat dem.

Skrevs
, registrerat som Verkstaden implementer (Claude Local), #2323
Modellfamilj som skrev det
Claude
Varför det skrevs
Authored for #2323 as new REGRESSION material in the outcome shapes of the controlled-pilot suite, sharing none of its text. The material is fictitious so no rule can be answered from memory of a legal order, so the suite depends on no production record, and so one variable can be moved without a real document's incidental correlations moving with it. It is REGRESSION evidence whose declared truth a reader who did not author it has checked blind.

Granskning

Skrivna av en AI-modellsession: Claude.

  • Blind läsning, Claude, 23 september 2026: 22 av 22 överens

    registrerat som Verkstaden orchestrator session (Claude Opus 5.5), blind read

    Ingen oenighet med facit.

    Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall

  • Blind läsning, Gemini, 4 oktober 2026: 19 av 22 överens

    registrerat som gemini-2.5-pro (Vertex europe-west1), blind read

    3 oenigheter med facit

    • Punkt item-06

      The reader found the closure entry's missing statement of where its papers are stored, as declared, but placed it under the "Closing note" heading; the key places it under no section.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Genuinely ambiguous: the rule attaches the duty to the whole entry, but a closing note is a natural home for it, and the packet does not say which. Kept as declared; #3082 sharpens the case.

    • Punkt item-07

      The reader agreed nothing is due for the sample run from a tap, but gave the reason as a condition not triggered; the key declares the sample out of the rule's scope.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Genuinely ambiguous: the packet names the four reasons without defining them, and the rule's wording reads both as a scope limit and as an unmet condition. Kept as declared; #3083 sharpens the reasons.

    • Punkt item-17

      The reader found the levy charged from a figure with no named document, as declared, but quoted the sentence that sets the levy; the key anchors the flaw on the sentence that states the figure.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Reader wrong: the rule's duty attaches to the figure ("a figure whose document is not named"), and the packet anchors an unsupported claim on the claim itself, which here is the figure, not the charge set from it.

    Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall

  • Kritisk granskning, Claude, 4 oktober 2026: 0 invändningar

    registrerat som Claude Project thread session for #3049, adversarial critique

    Ingen oenighet med facit.

AI-modeller skrev och granskade de här testfallen, som anges ovan. Ingen människa har granskat dem. Varje oenighet mellan en AI-granskare och facit publiceras här.

Fingeravtryck

SHA-256-hashvärden som en läsare kan jämföra med en publicerad körnings rapport.

Dokument
37f8abf88ff53803c9d7418c3bb80fcb85cf87d9cfd52d77765a008c8ec72172
Dokumentmall
37f8abf88ff53803c9d7418c3bb80fcb85cf87d9cfd52d77765a008c8ec72172
Regel A
4b5e9ea4cdcacf53a9ae72bae55be530610c5818ca8ef2dbbcfee44e1eaa5441

Resultat i publicerade körningar

Senaste först. Varje kolumn är en körning av det här testfallet.

  1. Mätkörning med releasedesignen, ingen release,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3Körning 4Körning 5
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The record BE-019 contains entries regarding vessel movement ('The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.'), crew arrangements ('The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.'), and berth status ('The inner berth is recorded as free.'). 2. TRACE: Tracing the movement entry under 'Movement between berths', the record states that the dredger Kestrel was moved between berths, but does not identify who ordered the move. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L1), every berthing entry in a record that states a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move, a duty resting on the author of the record. The document records a move but omits this mandatory identification. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The record violates L1 by stating that a vessel movement occurred without naming the person who ordered the move. This constitutes an omission of a required detail from a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM).

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of mandatory detail
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that a vessel was moved but omits the name of the person who ordered the move, contrary to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scanning the document text of berthing entry BE-019 reveals three factual sections: (a) 'Movement between berths' stating that 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.', (b) 'Crew arrangements' stating that 'The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.', and (c) 'Berth status' stating that 'The inner berth is recorded as free.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement regarding vessel movement, the document explicitly records that a vessel (the dredger Kestrel) was moved between berths. However, tracing the source/authorization of this movement reveals no mention of who authorized, requested, or ordered the vessel to be moved. 3. EVALUATE: According to the binding legal rule (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 [L1]), in any record, every berthing entry stating that a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move, a duty resting on the author of the record. The document is designated as a record. While it records the vessel movement, it fails to name the person who ordered the move. Under the omission rules, because the document contains a stated claim/measure ('The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.') but omits the required identity of the person responsible/ordering it, this is classified as an omission with omission_evidence='STATED_CLAIM'. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate one flaw object anchored on L1. There are no other rules, no norm conflicts, and no procedural strengths supported by the legal snippet.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of ordering party
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that the dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth, but omits the name of the person who ordered the move, in contravention of the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document contains a statement under 'Movement between berths': 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' It also notes crew arrangements and berth status. 2. TRACE: The statement records the physical movement of a vessel (dredger Kestrel) between berths within a berthing entry record (BE-019). 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L1), in a record, every berthing entry that states a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move. The text states that the vessel was moved, but completely omits the identity or name of the person who ordered the move. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate one flaw object indicating this omission on the stated claim.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of ordering party
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but omits the name of the person who ordered the move, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 4

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document contains the factual statement: "The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth." under the section "Movement between berths". 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement within the record reveals that no person or authority is identified as having ordered the movement of the vessel. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L1), every berthing entry in a record that states a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. The author has recorded the movement but omitted the name of the person who ordered it. 4. SYNTHESIZE: This constitutes an omission on a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM), violating the requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L1).

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing mandatory detail
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that a vessel was moved but fails to name the person who ordered the move, contrary to the mandatory requirement for records.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 5

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scanned the document for movements, berths, crew arrangements, and status. Identified the entry under 'Movement between berths': 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' 2. TRACE: Traced the entry to check whether the person who ordered the move is identified. The text contains no reference to who ordered or authorized the movement. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated against Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L1), which stipulates that every berthing entry in a record stating a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulated the flaw object noting the omission of the person who ordered the movement in a stated claim.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing mandatory information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  2. Schemalagd nattkörning,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a berthing record (BE-019) that contains three sections: 'Movement between berths', 'Crew arrangements', and 'Berth status'. Under 'Movement between berths', it makes the factual statement: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement regarding the vessel movement, the author of the record notes that the move took place, but does not state or attribute who ordered the movement. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (id: L1), in a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. The document fails to provide this required information. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate the finding as a flaw with omission_evidence set to 'STATED_CLAIM' since the claim of movement is stated in the record but omits the identity of the person who ordered it.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of required detail
    Förklaring
    The berthing record states that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth, but omits the name of the person who ordered the move, contrary to the requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  3. Schemalagd nattkörning,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record containing a berthing entry (BE-019) with three sections: 'Movement between berths' stating that 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.', 'Crew arrangements' stating that 'The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.', and 'Berth status' stating that 'The inner berth is recorded as free.' 2. TRACE: The entry specifically records that a vessel (the dredger Kestrel) was moved between berths. However, the record does not identify or name who ordered this move. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (id: L1), in a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move, placing this duty on the author of the record. The record states that the vessel was moved but omits the required identity of the person who ordered the move. 4. SYNTHESIZE: This constitutes an omission on a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM), as the document asserts that the move occurred but fails to include the mandatory naming of the person who ordered it under L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing identification of ordering person
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that a vessel was moved but fails to name the person who ordered the move, in violation of Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  4. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a berthing record (BE-019) containing statements regarding vessel movements, crew arrangements, and berth status. Specifically, it states: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement regarding vessel movement, the record states the movement took place between the inner berth and outer berth, but does not specify who ordered or authorized the move. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (id: L1), 'every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move. The duty rests on the author of the record.' The entry records a move but omits the identity of the person who ordered it. 4. SYNTHESIZE: There is a procedural/regulatory omission under L1. The claim stating the vessel was moved is present, but it omits the required identity of the person ordering the move, qualifying as an omission with stated claim evidence.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of ordering party
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, in violation of Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (AGENCY_REGULATION)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document contains the berthing entry BE-019, which states: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' It also contains notes regarding crew arrangements ('The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.') and berth status ('The inner berth is recorded as free.'). 2. TRACE: The statement that the vessel was moved ('The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.') is recorded under the section 'Movement between berths'. The text does not provide or attribute the name or identity of the person who ordered the move. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L1), in a record, every berthing entry that states a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move, placing this duty on the author of the record. The document records a vessel movement but omits the required identity of the person who authorized or ordered it. 4. SYNTHESIZE: This constitutes an omission on a stated claim (omission_evidence: 'STATED_CLAIM') in violation of Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing authorization identity
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document contains a berthing entry (BE-019) stating: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' It also notes crew arrangements and berth status. 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement regarding the vessel movement, the record states that the dredger Kestrel was moved between berths, but does not identify or state who ordered this movement. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (id: L1), in a record, every berthing entry stating that a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. The author failed to include the identity of the person ordering the move. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate an omission flaw (STATED_CLAIM) under the heading 'Movement between berths', citing Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of responsible person
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, contrary to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  5. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Identified the statement in the document under the heading 'Movement between berths': 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' 2. TRACE: Traced the entry to verify if the individual authorizing or ordering the vessel's movement is named. No individual or authority ordering the move is identified anywhere in the entry. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated against Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L1), which stipulates that every berthing entry stating a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. The document fails to provide this required name. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Recorded a procedural omission flaw anchored to L1, citing the exact quote and heading locator where the move is described without identifying the person who ordered it.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing required information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berthsSida: Page 1
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Identified the statement in the record under the heading 'Movement between berths': 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' 2. TRACE: Traced the entry to determine if the author specified who authorized or ordered this vessel movement. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L1), every berthing entry in a record that states a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. The text mentions the movement but completely omits the identity of the person who ordered it. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulated the flaw object noting the omission of the required name of the person ordering the vessel's movement.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of ordering authority
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but does not name the person who ordered the move, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scanning the document reveals three factual statements: the movement of the dredger Kestrel between berths, the overnight stay of the crew, and the status of the inner berth as free. 2. TRACE: Tracing the movement claim ('The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.'), this statement records the relocation of a vessel within a berthing record (BE-019) under the heading 'Movement between berths'. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (id: L1), every berthing entry in a record that states a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. The author recorded the movement but failed to identify the person who ordered it. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry violates the mandatory requirement in L1 by omitting the identity of the person who ordered the vessel's movement.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of ordering person
    Förklaring
    The berthing record states that the dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth, but omits the name of the person who ordered the move, contrary to the mandatory requirement of Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  6. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Identified the causal and factual statement in the berthing record: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' under the heading 'Movement between berths'. 2. TRACE: Traced the statement regarding the movement of the vessel in the document. The record does not identify or state who ordered this movement. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated against Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L1), which stipulates that in a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move, with the duty resting on the author of the record. The document lacks the identity of the person who ordered the vessel's movement. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulated the flaw object noting the omission of the ordering person's name in accordance with the mandatory requirement of L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of ordering party
    Förklaring
    The record documents that a vessel was moved but fails to name the person who ordered the move, contrary to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Identified the factual claim regarding vessel movement in the record: "The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth." 2. TRACE: Traced the entry to determine whether it identifies the person who ordered the movement. The entry records the movement and subsequent berth/crew arrangements, but does not state who ordered the move. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated against L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, "Who ordered a vessel moved"), which stipulates that in a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry violates the mandatory recording requirement under L1 by failing to specify who ordered the movement of the vessel.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing required information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, in violation of the requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scanned the document for movements, berthing details, and administrative records. The record states under the heading 'Movement between berths': 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' 2. TRACE: Traced the recorded movement against the requirements of the legal framework. The record notes the movement of the vessel between berths but contains no mention of who ordered or authorized the move. 3. EVALUATE: Compared against 'Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1' (L1), which explicitly mandates that in a record, every berthing entry stating that a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. The author omitted the required identification of the ordering party. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulated the flaw object noting the omission of the ordering party's name in the berthing movement entry under L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of required detail
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, contrary to the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  7. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a berthing record (BE-019) containing statements regarding the relocation of the dredger Kestrel from the inner berth to the outer berth, crew overnight arrangements, and inner berth availability status. 2. TRACE: Under the heading 'Movement between berths', the text explicitly asserts: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' No individual or authority ordering this movement is identified anywhere in the record. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L1), every berthing entry in a record that states a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move, and this duty rests on the author of the record. The document lacks the name of the person who ordered the movement of the dredger Kestrel. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The record fails to satisfy the mandatory identification requirement under L1. This omission constitutes a legal flaw under the applicable binding law.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing mandatory information
    Förklaring
    The record documents that a vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to identify the person who ordered the move, contrary to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scanned the document 'Berthing entry BE-019'. The document contains the claim 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth' under heading 'Movement between berths'. 2. TRACE: Traced the entry for vessel movement. The text specifies the vessel ('The dredger Kestrel') and the berths moved between ('from the inner berth to the outer berth'), but does not identify or state who ordered the move. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated against Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L1), which mandates that in a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. The duty explicitly rests on the author. The author omitted the required identification of the ordering individual. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Document non-compliance with L1 as an omission on the specific movement statement.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing mandatory information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that a vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth, but omits the name of the person who ordered the move, in violation of the requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Identified statements in the record 'Berthing entry BE-019'. Under heading 'Movement between berths', it states: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' Under 'Crew arrangements', it notes: 'The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.' Under 'Berth status', it notes: 'The inner berth is recorded as free.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement regarding the vessel movement, the author of the record notes that the dredger Kestrel was moved between berths, but does not provide any information regarding who ordered or authorized the movement. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated against Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L1), which explicitly requires that in a record, every berthing entry stating a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move. The text fails to name the person who ordered the vessel move. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulated a single flaw for the omission of mandatory information required by L1. No conflicting norms or valid strengths were identified under the provided legal framework.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of required information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth, but fails to name the person who ordered the move, in violation of the requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

Kontroll: motorn körd med fel regler

Visas skild från resultaten. Motorn fick ett annat falls regler, så varje fynd nedan är ett fynd mot regler som inte gäller det här dokumentet.

  1. Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: missad

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is titled 'Berthing entry BE-019' and contains three brief factual statements regarding the movement of the dredger Kestrel between berths, crew arrangements overnight, and the status of the inner berth as free. 2. TRACE: The statements describe logistical and operational facts concerning berthing. None of the entries constitute or mention a licence entry, nor do they state an administrative or legal licence decision. 3. EVALUATE: The single applicable binding law, L1 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part S, issue 1'), requires that in a record, every licence entry stating a decision must name the officer who made that decision. Since the document contains no licence entries and no licence decisions, the requirement under L1 is not engaged. 4. SYNTHESIZE: There are no legal flaws or procedural deviations under the provided framework. No procedural strengths directly map to the compliance criteria of L1.

    0 brister rapporterade

    0 styrkor rapporterade