GRANSKA
Logga inSkapa konto
Alla testfall

Testfall · The same entry read against one rule, and against that rule plus one it cannot offend

move-rule-with-tow-line-rule

Grupp
regression-irrelevant-rule · Gruppversion 1
Testsvit
Testsvit controlled-regression, version 1
Evidensklass
REGRESSION

Adding a rule the document cannot offend leaves the engine's structured result unchanged.

Testdokumenten, reglerna och facit visas på engelska, det språk de skrevs på.

Vad det här testfallet ändrar

Faktor
a rule the document cannot offend
Nivå
supplied
Jämförs med
move-rule-onlyÄndringen får inte ändra svaret. Reglerna som ges skiljer sig mellan de två.

The same entry, read against the move rule and one about tow lines it mentions none of.

Dokumentet motorn fick

Exakt den text motorn fick, rad för rad.

  1. Berthing entry BE-019
  2. Movement between berths
  3. The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
  4. Crew arrangements
  5. The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.
  6. Berth status
  7. The inner berth is recorded as free.

Reglerna motorn fick

Varje regel visas under en neutral beteckning i stället för sitt interna namn.

  • Regel A

    Who ordered a vessel moved

    Källa: Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1

    In a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move. The duty rests on the author of the record.

  • Regel B

    The rated load of a tow line

    Källa: Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1

    In a record, every berthing entry that mentions a tow line must give the rated load of that line. The duty rests on the author of the record.

Facit

Skrevs ner innan motorn kördes. move-order-unnamed-truth

The entry names nobody who ordered the move, which offends the first rule once. Exhaustive truth, so any finding drawn from the added rule counts as unexpected.

Facit är uttömmande: varje fynd som inte står som förväntat räknas som fel.

Förväntade fynd

  • BristUtelämnandeFynd move-without-ordering-person

    The entry says the dredger was moved and names nobody who ordered the move.

    Ska förankras i
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Ska hänvisa till
    Regel A
    Kontrolleras i
    granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten

Förbjudna fynd

Fel svar, nedskrivna i förväg.

  • StyrkaFynd move-praised-as-ordered

    Crediting the move sentence for naming who ordered it when it names nobody.

    Ska förankras i
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Ska hänvisa till
    Regel A
    Kontrolleras i
    granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten

Vad den blinda läsaren svarade

En AI-läsare fick det här dokumentet och dess regler, men inte facit, och svarade på egen hand. Jämför svaret med facit ovan.

  • Överens med facitClaude, 23 september 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-18
    • BristUtelämnandeRegel A

      Ska förankras i The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.

  • Överens med facitGemini, 4 oktober 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-14
    • BristUtelämnandeRegel A

      Ska förankras i The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.

Kritisk granskning av facit

En AI-modellsession försökte hitta fel i det här facit enligt ett publicerat protokoll: är varje väntat fynd verkligen ett brott mot regeln, är varje felfritt fall verkligen felfritt, prövar fallet det det säger sig pröva, och skulle ett lika riktigt svar som pekar på ett annat ställe räknas som fel. Den tittade inte på motorns resultat först. Varje invändning visas med hur den avgjordes. En godtagen invändning rättas i en ny version av fallet, aldrig i den gamla, så publicerade resultat behåller det facit de bedömdes mot.

Granskning av Claude, 4 oktober 2026

  • Invändning besvaradSvårighetRegel ARegel Bp1 · tow-line-rule-added

    Gäller hela gruppen av fall

    Rule B is triggered by a mention of a tow line, and the entry contains none, so the distractor can be dismissed by searching for the words. A distractor whose trigger is nearly met would be harder.

    Facit står kvar

    Rule B is near in subject (a dredger moved between berths is commonly moved under tow) and shares rule A's source label, so neither its topic nor its citation marks it as foreign. The hypothesis claims only that a rule the document cannot offend changes nothing, and that is what the pair tests.

  • Invändning besvaradGiltighetRegel ARegel Bp2 · tow-line-rule-added

    Gäller hela gruppen av fall

    Does the invariant pair change only the rule selection?

    Facit står kvar

    Both variants render the same bytes (one rendered SHA-256) and share one answer key; only the supplied rules differ, with rule B under the same authority type and source as rule A.

  • Invändning besvaradFullständighetRegel ARegel Bp3 · move-order-unnamed-truth

    "The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight." and "The inner berth is recorded as free." are further claims. Could either owe something under rule A or rule B?

    Facit står kvar

    Rule A is triggered by a vessel being moved and rule B by a tow line being mentioned. Neither sentence does either, so the move sentence is the only breach.

Testets instruktion till granskaren

Testkonfigurationen gav AI-granskaren den här instruktionen vid sidan av reglerna. Det är testets egen instruktion. Produktionens systemprompt visas inte.

You read one document and apply only the rules supplied to you in the legal framework, exactly as each rule is written. Report every place where the document does not meet a supplied rule, and apply what a supplied rule says about how a record that meets it is to be recorded. Quote each passage exactly as it appears. Do not apply a rule that was not supplied, and do not rely on any knowledge of a legal system.

Vem som skrev och läste det här testfallet

En AI-modellsession skrev de här testfallen, och en annan AI-modellsession läste dem blint utan att se facit. Ingen människa har granskat dem.

Skrevs
, registrerat som Verkstaden implementer (Claude Local), #2323
Modellfamilj som skrev det
Claude
Varför det skrevs
Authored for #2323 as new REGRESSION material in the outcome shapes of the controlled-pilot suite, sharing none of its text. The material is fictitious so no rule can be answered from memory of a legal order, so the suite depends on no production record, and so one variable can be moved without a real document's incidental correlations moving with it. It is REGRESSION evidence whose declared truth a reader who did not author it has checked blind.

Granskning

Skrivna av en AI-modellsession: Claude.

  • Blind läsning, Claude, 23 september 2026: 22 av 22 överens

    registrerat som Verkstaden orchestrator session (Claude Opus 5.5), blind read

    Ingen oenighet med facit.

    Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall

  • Blind läsning, Gemini, 4 oktober 2026: 19 av 22 överens

    registrerat som gemini-2.5-pro (Vertex europe-west1), blind read

    3 oenigheter med facit

    • Punkt item-06

      The reader found the closure entry's missing statement of where its papers are stored, as declared, but placed it under the "Closing note" heading; the key places it under no section.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Genuinely ambiguous: the rule attaches the duty to the whole entry, but a closing note is a natural home for it, and the packet does not say which. Kept as declared; #3082 sharpens the case.

    • Punkt item-07

      The reader agreed nothing is due for the sample run from a tap, but gave the reason as a condition not triggered; the key declares the sample out of the rule's scope.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Genuinely ambiguous: the packet names the four reasons without defining them, and the rule's wording reads both as a scope limit and as an unmet condition. Kept as declared; #3083 sharpens the reasons.

    • Punkt item-17

      The reader found the levy charged from a figure with no named document, as declared, but quoted the sentence that sets the levy; the key anchors the flaw on the sentence that states the figure.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Reader wrong: the rule's duty attaches to the figure ("a figure whose document is not named"), and the packet anchors an unsupported claim on the claim itself, which here is the figure, not the charge set from it.

    Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall

  • Kritisk granskning, Claude, 4 oktober 2026: 0 invändningar

    registrerat som Claude Project thread session for #3049, adversarial critique

    Ingen oenighet med facit.

AI-modeller skrev och granskade de här testfallen, som anges ovan. Ingen människa har granskat dem. Varje oenighet mellan en AI-granskare och facit publiceras här.

Fingeravtryck

SHA-256-hashvärden som en läsare kan jämföra med en publicerad körnings rapport.

Dokument
37f8abf88ff53803c9d7418c3bb80fcb85cf87d9cfd52d77765a008c8ec72172
Dokumentmall
37f8abf88ff53803c9d7418c3bb80fcb85cf87d9cfd52d77765a008c8ec72172
Regel A
4b5e9ea4cdcacf53a9ae72bae55be530610c5818ca8ef2dbbcfee44e1eaa5441
Regel B
5447e2e1fbdbd6908017eb7b1f781b1c18fd5d38d125888e0c7676d78ead10f7

Resultat i publicerade körningar

Senaste först. Varje kolumn är en körning av det här testfallet.

  1. Mätkörning med releasedesignen, ingen release,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3Körning 4Körning 5
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record titled 'Berthing entry BE-019'. Under the section 'Movement between berths', it states: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' It also contains sections 'Crew arrangements' and 'Berth status'. 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement regarding vessel movement, the entry records that the dredger Kestrel was moved between berths. However, no person or authority ordering the movement is named anywhere in the record. 3. EVALUATE: Under binding law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'Who ordered a vessel moved'), in a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move. The author failed to include this required detail in the entry describing the movement. Regarding law L2 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'The rated load of a tow line'), no tow line is mentioned, so L2 is not applicable. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw for the omission of the identity of the person who ordered the vessel move under L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of ordering authority
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, in violation of Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record entitled 'Berthing entry BE-019'. It contains factual statements under three headings: 'Movement between berths' stating 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.', 'Crew arrangements' stating 'The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.', and 'Berth status' stating 'The inner berth is recorded as free.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.', the entry records a vessel movement between berths. However, it does not identify or name the person who ordered the movement. 3. EVALUATE: According to Law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'Who ordered a vessel moved'), 'In a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move. The duty rests on the author of the record.' The record clearly states that a vessel was moved but omits the mandatory identification of the person who ordered the move. This constitutes an omission on a stated claim (omission_evidence: STATED_CLAIM). According to Law L2 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'The rated load of a tow line'), the requirement to give the rated load applies when a tow line is mentioned; the document does not mention a tow line, so L2 is not engaged. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw for the failure to name the person who ordered the vessel move under Law L1. No norm conflicts or legal strengths are present.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing mandatory attribution
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth, but fails to name the person who ordered the move as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scan the text for relevant claims and recorded events regarding vessel movements, tow lines, and berthing details. The text states: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' 2. TRACE: Trace the statement regarding vessel movement under the heading 'Movement between berths'. The text records the vessel movement but provides no information regarding who ordered the move. 3. EVALUATE: Compare against the legal framework. Law L1 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1') mandates that in a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move, placing this duty on the record's author. The document explicitly records a move but omits the required identity of the person who ordered it. Law L2 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1') mandates giving the rated load of a tow line if mentioned, but no tow line is mentioned in the entry, so L2 is not engaged. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw for the omission of the ordering party's identity pursuant to Law L1. No norm conflicts or explicit legal strengths are identified.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of ordering party
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that the dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth, but fails to name the person who ordered the move as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 4

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document contains a record of a berthing entry (BE-019) stating: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' It also records that the crew stayed aboard overnight and that the inner berth is free. 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement regarding vessel movement, the record states that the vessel was moved, but does not provide any information regarding who authorized or ordered this movement. 3. EVALUATE: According to Law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'Who ordered a vessel moved'), in a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move. The author failed to state who ordered the move. According to Law L2 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'The rated load of a tow line'), if a tow line is mentioned, its rated load must be given; no tow line is mentioned in the text, so L2 is not applicable. 4. SYNTHESIZE: There is one flaw: an omission in a stated claim where a vessel movement is recorded without naming the person who ordered the move under Law L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of authorizing person
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that a vessel was moved but does not name the person who ordered the move, contrary to the requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (Who ordered a vessel moved).
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, Who ordered a vessel moved (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 5

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record entitled 'Berthing entry BE-019'. Under the heading 'Movement between berths', it states: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' Under 'Crew arrangements', it states: 'The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.' Under 'Berth status', it states: 'The inner berth is recorded as free.' 2. TRACE: The statement concerning vessel movement ('The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.') originates from the record's author. No person who ordered the movement is named in the entry or elsewhere in the document. No tow line is mentioned in the record. 3. EVALUATE: According to L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'Who ordered a vessel moved'), every berthing entry in a record that states a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move. The document records a move of the dredger Kestrel but fails to state who ordered it. This is a non-compliance under L1. Regarding L2 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'The rated load of a tow line'), no tow line is mentioned, so L2 is not engaged. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate one flaw object for the omission of the ordering person under L1. Because the document states the claim/event of the vessel move but omits the required detail (the person ordering the move), this is classified as is_omission=true with omission_evidence='STATED_CLAIM' quoting the sentence describing the move.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing required information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that a vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, contrary to the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  2. Schemalagd nattkörning,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record entitled 'Berthing entry BE-019'. Under the heading 'Movement between berths', it states: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' It also contains sections regarding crew arrangements and berth status. 2. TRACE: Tracing the claim regarding the vessel movement against the provided legal framework reveals two binding rules: Law L1 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1' - 'Who ordered a vessel moved'), which mandates that every berthing entry stating a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move; and Law L2 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1' - 'The rated load of a tow line'), which requires the rated load of a tow line to be stated whenever a tow line is mentioned. 3. EVALUATE: The document mentions that the dredger Kestrel was moved, but completely omits the identity of the person who ordered the move. This violates Law L1. Because a movement is stated but the mandatory identifying detail is omitted, this constitutes an omission with evidence type 'STATED_CLAIM'. Law L2 is not engaged as no tow line is mentioned in the record. No other legal rules or guidelines are provided. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate one flaw object under Law L1 for the failure to name the person ordering the vessel move. No norm conflicts or strengths under the provided rules are present.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing mandatory information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that a vessel was moved but fails to name the person who ordered the move, contrary to the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  3. Schemalagd nattkörning,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record entitled 'Berthing entry BE-019' consisting of three sections: 'Movement between berths' stating that 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.', 'Crew arrangements' stating that 'The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.', and 'Berth status' stating that 'The inner berth is recorded as free.' 2. TRACE: The claim under 'Movement between berths' indicates that the vessel 'Kestrel' was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth. Tracing the origin and authorization of this move reveals no mention or identification of the individual who ordered the vessel move. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (Law L1), every berthing entry in a record that says a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. The text records the movement of the dredger Kestrel but omits the name of the person who ordered it. Law L2 requires giving the rated load of a tow line whenever a tow line is mentioned; however, no tow line is mentioned in the document, so L2 is not engaged. No other legal rules or guidelines are provided. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw for the omission of the ordering person's name under Law L1, categorized as an omission of a required detail from a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM).

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of authorizing person
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, contrary to the mandatory requirement for berthing records.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  4. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a berthing entry record (BE-019). It states: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.', 'The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.', and 'The inner berth is recorded as free.' 2. TRACE: The statement 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' records the movement of a vessel between berths. Tracing back through the document reveals no mention of who ordered this movement. The document also does not mention any tow line. 3. EVALUATE: According to Law L1 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1', Reference: 'Who ordered a vessel moved'), in a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. The author omitted the name of the person who ordered the movement of the dredger Kestrel. According to Law L2, berthing entries mentioning a tow line must give its rated load; since no tow line is mentioned, L2 is not engaged. There are no conflicting norms. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate one flaw object under Law L1 as an omission on a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM), identifying the omitted ordering person while quoting the sentence describing the move.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of ordering party
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth, but fails to name the person who ordered the move, contrary to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (Who ordered a vessel moved).
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scanned the document 'Berthing entry BE-019' which contains sections 'Movement between berths', 'Crew arrangements', and 'Berth status'. Identified the statement: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' 2. TRACE: Traced the movement entry under 'Movement between berths'. The document records the vessel movement but provides no information regarding who ordered the move. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated against L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'Who ordered a vessel moved'), which mandates that in a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. The author failed to include this mandatory detail. Evaluated against L2 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'The rated load of a tow line'), which requires the rated load of a tow line to be recorded if a tow line is mentioned; no tow line is mentioned, so L2 is not engaged. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulated the single flaw finding under L1 as an omission with stated claim evidence, quoting the movement statement.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing mandatory information
    Förklaring
    The record documents that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, in violation of Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (Who ordered a vessel moved).
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scanned the document 'Berthing entry BE-019'. The record contains three sections: 'Movement between berths', stating 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.'; 'Crew arrangements', stating 'The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.'; and 'Berth status', stating 'The inner berth is recorded as free.' 2. TRACE: Traced the statement regarding vessel movement under 'Movement between berths'. The entry records a move of the dredger Kestrel from the inner berth to the outer berth. The record does not identify or state who ordered this movement. The record also does not mention any tow line. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated against the legal framework: - Law L1 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1', 'Who ordered a vessel moved'): Mandates that in a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move. The document records that the dredger Kestrel was moved but fails to name the person who ordered the move. This constitutes an omission on a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM). - Law L2 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1', 'The rated load of a tow line'): Mandates that every berthing entry mentioning a tow line must give its rated load. The document does not mention a tow line, so this conditional requirement is not triggered. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulated findings: One flaw identified under Law L1 for omitting the identity of the person who ordered the vessel's movement.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing mandatory information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth, but omits the name of the person who ordered the move as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  5. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a berthing entry (BE-019) within a record. Under the heading 'Movement between berths', it states: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' It also details crew arrangements and berth status. 2. TRACE: The statement that the dredger Kestrel was moved describes the movement of a vessel. Law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'Who ordered a vessel moved') stipulates that in a record, every berthing entry stating that a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. 3. EVALUATE: The entry records the vessel move but omits the name/identity of the person who ordered the movement. Law L2 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'The rated load of a tow line') is not engaged as no tow line is mentioned in the record. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate one flaw object for the omission of the person ordering the vessel move under Law L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of required detail
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, in violation of Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a berthing entry (BE-019) containing statements regarding vessel movement: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' It also contains notes on crew arrangements and berth status. 2. TRACE: The claim describes the movement of a vessel from the inner berth to the outer berth. The author of the record records this event but does not state who ordered the move. 3. EVALUATE: According to L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'Who ordered a vessel moved'), every berthing entry in a record that states a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. The document fails to include this required detail. Regarding L2 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'The rated load of a tow line'), the document does not mention a tow line, so L2 is not engaged. 4. SYNTHESIZE: A single flaw is identified under L1 for omitting the identity of the person who ordered the vessel's movement.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of mandatory detail
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that a vessel was moved but fails to name the person who ordered the move, contrary to the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record entitled 'Berthing entry BE-019'. Under the heading 'Movement between berths', it states: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' Under 'Crew arrangements', it notes: 'The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.' Under 'Berth status', it records: 'The inner berth is recorded as free.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement regarding the vessel movement ('The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.'), the text states the move took place but provides no attribution or identification of who ordered or authorized the movement. 3. EVALUATE: According to L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'Who ordered a vessel moved'), every berthing entry in a record that states a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move, placing this duty on the author of the record. The document contains a statement of vessel movement but omits the required identity of the person who ordered it. According to L2 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'The rated load of a tow line'), entries mentioning a tow line must provide its rated load; however, no tow line is mentioned in the document, so L2 is not engaged. 4. SYNTHESIZE: A single omission flaw is identified under L1 for failing to record the person who ordered the move of the vessel. No norm conflicts are present. No procedural strengths meeting the threshold of an affirmative compliance with a specific snippet are present.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing mandatory information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, contrary to the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  6. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scan the record text for claims and factual statements. The record states under 'Movement between berths': 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' It also states under 'Crew arrangements' that 'The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight' and under 'Berth status' that 'The inner berth is recorded as free.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement regarding vessel movement ('The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.'), the text describes the berthing move but does not mention or identify who ordered the move. Tracing mentions of equipment, no tow lines are mentioned. 3. EVALUATE: Compare against the legal framework. Law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 - 'Who ordered a vessel moved') requires that in a record, every berthing entry stating a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move. The berthing entry records the move of the dredger Kestrel but fails to identify the person who ordered it. Law L2 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 - 'The rated load of a tow line') applies only when a tow line is mentioned, which is not the case here. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw object for the omission of the identity of the person who ordered the move under L1. Since this is an omission regarding a stated claim in the text, is_omission is set to true and the relevant sentence is quoted. No norm conflicts or demonstrable strengths under the provided legal framework exist.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing mandatory information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth, but omits the name of the person who ordered the move as mandated by Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scan the text for all causal claims, factual conclusions, and recorded events. The document records under the heading 'Movement between berths' that 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' It also records crew arrangements ('The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.') and berth status ('The inner berth is recorded as free.'). 2. TRACE: Trace the statement regarding vessel movement against the governing legal framework. The text records the movement of the vessel Kestrel between berths, but provides no identification of who ordered the movement. 3. EVALUATE: Compare against the binding rules in the legal framework: - Law L1 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1', Reference: 'Who ordered a vessel moved') stipulates: 'In a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move. The duty rests on the author of the record.' The document is a record of berthing entry BE-019, states that the dredger Kestrel was moved, but completely omits naming the person who ordered the move. This is a direct legal omission on an explicit statement. - Law L2 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1', Reference: 'The rated load of a tow line') mandates giving the rated load of a tow line if mentioned. No tow line is mentioned in the document, so L2 is not engaged. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate the flaw for the omission of the ordering person under L1. Check for procedural strengths mapping strictly to provided snippets (none identified). Check for norm conflicts (none identified).

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing mandatory information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the vessel was moved but fails to name the person who ordered the move, contrary to the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: In the document 'Berthing entry BE-019', the author records under 'Movement between berths' that 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' Under 'Crew arrangements', the document states 'The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.' Under 'Berth status', it notes 'The inner berth is recorded as free.' 2. TRACE: The statement recording the vessel movement ('The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.') is recorded directly by the author as a factual record of movement between berths. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L1), every berthing entry in a record that states a vessel was moved must name the person who ordered the move, placing this duty on the author of the record. The document records a vessel move but completely omits the identity of the person who ordered the move. According to Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (L2), every berthing entry mentioning a tow line must give its rated load; however, no tow line is mentioned in the document, so L2 is not engaged. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw identifying the omission of the name of the person who ordered the move in the berthing entry concerning the dredger Kestrel under L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing mandatory information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth, but omits the name of the person who ordered the move, contrary to the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (AGENCY_REGULATION)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  7. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document contains a berthing entry (BE-019) stating: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.', 'The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.', and 'The inner berth is recorded as free.' 2. TRACE: The statement regarding the movement of the vessel appears under the section 'Movement between berths'. No person ordering the move is stated. 3. EVALUATE: According to Law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'Who ordered a vessel moved'), in a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move. The author omitted the name of the person who ordered the movement of the dredger Kestrel. Law L2 regarding tow lines is not applicable since no tow line is mentioned. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a flaw identifying the omission of the identity of the person who ordered the vessel's move under L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing required information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth but fails to name the person who ordered the move, in violation of Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (Who ordered a vessel moved).
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record entitled 'Berthing entry BE-019'. Under 'Movement between berths', it states: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.' Under 'Crew arrangements', it notes: 'The crew of the dredger stayed aboard overnight.' Under 'Berth status', it notes: 'The inner berth is recorded as free.' 2. TRACE: The statement that the vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth describes a vessel movement. There is no mention of who ordered the vessel to be moved. 3. EVALUATE: Under L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1, 'Who ordered a vessel moved'), in a record, every berthing entry that says a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move. The author failed to include the identity of the person who ordered the movement of the dredger Kestrel. L2 concerns tow lines, but no tow line is mentioned in the record, so L2 is not engaged. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw for the omission of the ordering person's name under L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of ordering authority
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry states that the dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth, but fails to name the person who ordered the move as mandated by Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record containing berthing entry BE-019. It states: 'The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.', describes crew arrangements, and notes the inner berth status as free. 2. TRACE: The entry records a vessel movement ('The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.'), but nowhere in the entry is the person who ordered the move identified. 3. EVALUATE: Under Law L1 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1', 'Who ordered a vessel moved'), every berthing entry in a record that says a vessel was moved must also name the person who ordered the move, placing this duty on the author of the record. The document fails to provide this required name. Law L2 regarding tow lines is not applicable as no tow line is mentioned. 4. SYNTHESIZE: One omission flaw is identified under L1. No norm conflicts or procedural strengths are present.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing mandatory information
    Förklaring
    The berthing entry records that a vessel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth, but omits the name of the person who ordered the move, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1.
    Citat
    The dredger Kestrel was moved from the inner berth to the outer berth.
    Var
    Under the heading Movement between berthsCiterad rubrik: Movement between berths
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part R, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

Kontroll: motorn körd med fel regler

Visas skild från resultaten. Motorn fick ett annat falls regler, så varje fynd nedan är ett fynd mot regler som inte gäller det här dokumentet.

  1. Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren
    • move-without-ordering-person Brist: missad

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document under review is 'Berthing entry BE-019', which records operational information regarding the movement of the dredger Kestrel from the inner berth to the outer berth, notes that the crew stayed aboard overnight, and updates the berth status of the inner berth to free. No licensing decisions, regulatory rulings, or administrative determinations are articulated in the text. 2. TRACE: The statements in the text are operational log entries concerning vessel location, crew stay, and berth availability. 3. EVALUATE: The sole binding legal provision provided is Law L1 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part S, issue 1 - Naming the officer behind a decision'), which stipulates: 'In a record, every licence entry that states a decision must also name the officer who made that decision. The duty rests on the author of the record.' The document is a berthing log entry rather than a licence entry, and it does not record any licensing or administrative decisions. Consequently, the specific statutory condition triggering the requirement to name a deciding officer is not present, and no violation of Law L1 occurs. 4. SYNTHESIZE: There are no legal flaws or deviations from the provided legal framework. Additionally, as no specific procedural compliance step governed by Law L1 was executed, no procedural strengths are reportable.

    0 brister rapporterade

    0 styrkor rapporterade