GRANSKA
Logga inSkapa konto
Alla testfall

Testfall · A required step recorded with its detail, and the same step left bare

seal-detail-given

Grupp
regression-recorded-step · Gruppversion 2
Testsvit
Testsvit controlled-regression, version 1
Evidensklass
REGRESSION

The engine credits a seal examination whose sentence gives each seal's number and state, and reports the omission when the same entry says the seals were examined and gives neither.

Testdokumenten, reglerna och facit visas på engelska, det språk de skrevs på.

Vad det här testfallet ändrar

Faktor
seal numbers and state in the examination sentence
Nivå
present
Jämförs med
seal-detail-missingÄndringen ska ändra svaret. Ett textställe i dokumentet skiljer sig mellan de två.

The examination sentence gives each seal's number and says both were unbroken.

Dokumentet motorn fick

Exakt den text motorn fick, rad för rad.

  1. Seal entry SE-208
  2. Consignment at the gate
  3. A trailer of boxed pipe fittings arrived at the north gate.
  4. Seal examination
  5. The seals on the trailer, numbers 30817 and 30818, were examined at the gate and both found unbroken.
  6. Release to the yard
  7. The trailer was released to the holding yard.

Reglerna motorn fick

Varje regel visas under en neutral beteckning i stället för sitt interna namn.

  • Regel A

    Examining the seals on a load

    Källa: Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1

    In a record, every seal entry that says the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and say whether it was found unbroken. The duty rests on the author of the record. An entry that gives both is to be credited as soundly supported in this respect.

Facit

Skrevs ner innan motorn kördes. seal-detail-given-truth

The examination is recorded in one sentence with each seal's number and state, which the rule says is to be credited, and no flaw.

Facit är uttömmande: varje fynd som inte står som förväntat räknas som fel.

Förväntade fynd

  • StyrkaFynd seals-numbered-and-stated

    The sentence recording the examination gives the number of each seal and says each was unbroken, which the rule says is to be credited.

    Ska förankras i
    The seals on the trailer, numbers 30817 and 30818, were examined at the gate and both found unbroken.
    Ska hänvisa till
    Regel A
    Kontrolleras i
    granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten

Förbjudna fynd

Fel svar, nedskrivna i förväg.

  • BristUtelämnandeFynd false-bare-seal-examination

    Reporting the examination as missing its detail when its sentence gives it is a false positive.

    Ska förankras i
    The seals on the trailer, numbers 30817 and 30818, were examined at the gate and both found unbroken.
    Ska hänvisa till
    Regel A
    Kontrolleras i
    granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten

Vad den blinda läsaren svarade

En AI-läsare fick det här dokumentet och dess regler, men inte facit, och svarade på egen hand. Jämför svaret med facit ovan.

  • Överens med facitClaude, 5 oktober 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-02
    • StyrkaRegel A

      Ska förankras i The seals on the trailer, numbers 30817 and 30818, were examined at the gate and both found unbroken.

  • Inte överens med facitGemini, 5 oktober 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-01
    • StyrkaRegel A

      Ska förankras i The seals on the trailer, numbers 30817 and 30818, were examined at the gate and both found unbroken.

    Regler som läsaren fann redan uppfyllda

    • Regel A: The seals on the trailer, numbers 30817 and 30818, were examined at the gate and both found unbroken.

Kritisk granskning av facit

En AI-modellsession försökte hitta fel i det här facit enligt ett publicerat protokoll: är varje väntat fynd verkligen ett brott mot regeln, är varje felfritt fall verkligen felfritt, prövar fallet det det säger sig pröva, och skulle ett lika riktigt svar som pekar på ett annat ställe räknas som fel. Den tittade inte på motorns resultat först. Varje invändning visas med hur den avgjordes. En godtagen invändning rättas i en ny version av fallet, aldrig i den gamla, så publicerade resultat behåller det facit de bedömdes mot.

Ingen kritisk granskning av det här facit finns registrerad.

Testets instruktion till granskaren

Testkonfigurationen gav AI-granskaren den här instruktionen vid sidan av reglerna. Det är testets egen instruktion. Produktionens systemprompt visas inte.

You read one document and apply only the rules supplied to you in the legal framework, exactly as each rule is written. Report every place where the document does not meet a supplied rule, and apply what a supplied rule says about how a record that meets it is to be recorded. Quote each passage exactly as it appears. Do not apply a rule that was not supplied, and do not rely on any knowledge of a legal system.

Vem som skrev och läste det här testfallet

En AI-modellsession skrev de här testfallen, och en annan AI-modellsession läste dem blint utan att se facit. Ingen människa har granskat dem.

Skrevs
, registrerat som Claude Project thread session for #3074
Modellfamilj som skrev det
Claude
Varför det skrevs
Authored for #2323 as new REGRESSION material in the outcome shapes of the controlled-pilot suite, sharing none of its text. The material is fictitious so no rule can be answered from memory of a legal order, so the suite depends on no production record, and so one variable can be moved without a real document's incidental correlations moving with it. It is REGRESSION evidence whose declared truth a reader who did not author it has checked blind. Version 2 corrects version 1 for #3074: its credited strength was anchored on the detail line alone, so a strength quoting the examination sentence the rule attaches to was scored as a miss. Version 2 gives each seal's number and state in that sentence, one claim on one line.

Granskning

Skrivna av en AI-modellsession: Claude.

  • Blind läsning, Claude, 5 oktober 2026: 2 av 2 överens

    registrerat som Claude Project thread subagent for #3074, blind read

    Ingen oenighet med facit.

    Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall
  • Blind läsning, Gemini, 5 oktober 2026: 1 av 2 överens

    registrerat som gemini-2.5-pro (Vertex europe-west1), blind read

    1 oenighet med facit
    • Punkt item-01

      The reader credited the examination sentence as the strength, on the key's own words, and also listed the rule as met by that same sentence; the key declares no met rule beside the strength.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Reader over-reported, key kept: the packet says a rule met by nothing but the words already credited as a strength needs no met-rule entry, and the reader's strength, rule and quote are the key's.

    Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall

AI-modeller skrev och granskade de här testfallen, som anges ovan. Ingen människa har granskat dem. Varje oenighet mellan en AI-granskare och facit publiceras här.

Fingeravtryck

SHA-256-hashvärden som en läsare kan jämföra med en publicerad körnings rapport.

Dokument
ca5b99b34f9150ce7e9d9768a9a0ecf984f115eec61f463713ce8819572f74ff
Dokumentmall
08c7bc072c1b3622302eb9bd864a86ec73478cb663e04910b9882fdfd8649325
Regel A
332375509a8078159cf95e0cc3a2479d9248fc4178c5af0762ba838646c75ff1

Resultat i publicerade körningar

Senaste först. Varje kolumn är en körning av det här testfallet.

  1. Mätkörning med releasedesignen, ingen release,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3Körning 4Körning 5
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Bedömt mot version 1Med den sammanslagna rapportenGranskare: Samma fynd i varje körningSammanslagen rapport: Samma fynd i varje körning

    Granskare

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Sammanslagen rapport

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Granskare

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Sammanslagen rapport

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Granskare

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Sammanslagen rapport

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Granskare

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Sammanslagen rapport

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Granskare

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Sammanslagen rapport

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Identify all statements in the text regarding seal examination: The record states under heading 'Seal examination' that 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' and 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 2. TRACE: Trace the requirements of Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1). L1 requires that every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must provide the number of each seal and confirm whether it was found unbroken. 3. EVALUATE: The document lists both seal numbers (30817 and 30818) and explicitly confirms their condition ('were both found unbroken'). L1 dictates that an entry providing both items is to be credited as soundly supported in this respect. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The document exhibits full compliance with L1 without any procedural omissions or deviations. Therefore, no flaws are present, and one procedural strength is identified.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The entry records the specific numbers of the examined seals and confirms that both were found unbroken, satisfying the statutory documentation requirement.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document contains a seal examination entry stating that the seals on the trailer were examined at the gate, followed by the specific identification of seal 30817 and seal 30818 as being both found unbroken. 2. TRACE: The statement of seal examination is directly grounded in the observation and recording of the specific seal numbers (30817 and 30818) and their condition at the time of examination (unbroken). 3. EVALUATE: Applying the binding legal framework (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1, 'Examining the seals on a load'), every seal entry in a record indicating that the seals on a load were examined must state the number of each seal and whether it was found unbroken. The document explicitly includes both required elements. 4. SYNTHESIZE: There are no procedural or substantive flaws under the provided rule. The entry fulfills all requirements of L1 and is credited as soundly supported in this respect.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The seal entry provides the specific identification number of each examined seal and explicitly records that each was found unbroken, fulfilling the documentation requirements for load seal examinations.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scanned the document for all statements regarding the arrival, examination, and release of the consignment. The text states under 'Seal examination' that 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' and 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 2. TRACE: Traced the seal examination statements to the author of the record. The author recorded that the seals were examined, gave the specific seal numbers ('30817' and '30818'), and stated their condition upon examination ('were both found unbroken'). 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated these entries against the binding law (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1, 'Examining the seals on a load' [L1]). L1 establishes that in a record, every seal entry that says the seals on a load were examined must give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken, and that an entry meeting both criteria is to be credited as soundly supported. The document provides both required elements: the identification numbers of each seal and the finding that they were unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The record complies fully with L1 without any omissions or procedural deviations. Consequently, no legal flaws are identified, and a procedural strength is recorded under L1.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The seal entry records the examination of the load by specifying the identification numbers of each seal and confirming that both were found unbroken, fully satisfying the requirement for a soundly supported seal examination entry.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    Körning 4

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record (Seal entry SE-208) containing statements regarding the arrival of a consignment at the north gate, the examination of seals on the trailer ('The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.'), the specific seal identification numbers and condition ('Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.'), and subsequent release to the holding yard. 2. TRACE: Tracing the seal examination entry backward, the record documents that the trailer's seals were examined at the gate and provides the specific seal numbers along with their unbroken status. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluating against the sole binding rule L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1, 'Examining the seals on a load'), the rule dictates that every seal entry stating seals were examined must give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. Furthermore, L1 explicitly establishes that an entry providing both elements is to be credited as soundly supported. The document provides both seal numbers (30817 and 30818) and confirms that both were found unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: There are no legal or procedural flaws in the document under the provided legal framework. A procedural strength is recorded reflecting compliance with L1.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The seal entry records the examination of the trailer seals and explicitly provides the identification number of each seal alongside the finding that each was unbroken, fully satisfying the statutory standard for sound evidentiary support.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    Körning 5

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record ('Seal entry SE-208') recording the arrival and examination of a consignment. It states under 'Seal examination' that 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' and 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 2. TRACE: The statement directly records the examination of the trailer seals, identifying seal 30817 and seal 30818, and confirming that both were unbroken. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (Law L1), every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. Law L1 further specifies that an entry providing both is to be credited as soundly supported. The document includes both the numbers of the seals and the fact that they were found unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: There are no legal or procedural flaws present. The record complies fully with Law L1, fulfilling the statutory requirement.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The seal entry identifies the number of each examined seal and confirms that both were found unbroken, satisfying the requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 to be credited as soundly supported.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    Körning 1 · Med den sammanslagna rapporten

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scanned the record for all factual statements regarding seal examinations. The record contains a section titled 'Seal examination' stating 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' and 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 2. TRACE: Traced the statements to assess whether the entry identifies the specific seal numbers and records their condition upon examination. The text identifies the seal numbers as 30817 and 30818 and explicitly confirms both were found unbroken. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated the entry against the sole applicable binding legal standard L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1, 'Examining the seals on a load'). Under L1, every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must specify the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. L1 further provides that an entry satisfying both requirements must be credited as soundly supported. The record fulfills all criteria set forth in L1. 4. SYNTHESIZE: No legal flaws or omissions were identified. A single procedural strength is recorded in accordance with L1.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The record specifies the identification number of each examined seal and confirms that both were found unbroken, fully complying with the mandatory recording requirement.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)
    Sammanslagningsanrop
    {
      "consolidated_strengths": [
        {
          "description": "The record specifies the unique identification numbers of the inspected seals and confirms that both were found unbroken, adhering to the mandatory recording requirements.",
          "exact_quote": "Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.",
          "page_reference": null,
          "regulatory_references": [
            {
              "primary_authority_type": "STATUTE",
              "primary_binding_source": "Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1",
              "primary_label": "L1",
              "supporting_authority_type": null,
              "supporting_guideline": null,
              "supporting_label": null
            }
          ],
          "strength_title": "Documentation of Seal Identification Numbers and Integrity Status"
        }
      ],
      "deduplicated_flaws": [],
      "detected_language": "English",
      "executive_summary": "The analysis identified 0 legal flaws and 1 legal strength. The document is evaluated as flawless with respect to the audited requirements.",
      "internal_reasoning": "1. CLASSIFY: The document type is identified as 'record'. The audit findings contain 0 flaws and 1 strength. 2. MERGE: There are no flaws to evaluate or merge. The single reported strength does not conflict with any reported flaw and contains no unresolved procedural limitation, so it is retained without modification. 3. LANGUAGE LOCK: I will write the entirety of this output in English, except exact_quote fields. 4. CONSTRUCT: The executive summary will state the quantitative count of 0 flaws and 1 strength. The deduplicated flaws list is empty, is_flawless is true, and the consolidated strengths list contains the single validated strength item.",
      "is_flawless": true
    }

    Körning 2 · Med den sammanslagna rapporten

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The record SE-208 contains statements regarding the arrival and examination of a consignment: 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate. Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 2. TRACE: The examination notes are recorded directly by the author of the record under the section regarding seal examination. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must provide the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The text explicitly records seal numbers 30817 and 30818 and states that both were found unbroken. The provision explicitly dictates that an entry giving both is to be credited as soundly supported. 4. SYNTHESIZE: There are no legal or procedural deviations. The documentation satisfies all statutory requirements of L1, constituting a procedural strength.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The record documents the examination of the load by providing the specific seal numbers (30817 and 30818) and confirming that each was found unbroken, fulfilling the statutory requirement for seal examination entries.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)
    Sammanslagningsanrop
    {
      "consolidated_strengths": [
        {
          "description": "The record documents the examination of the load by providing the specific seal numbers (30817 and 30818) and confirming that each was found unbroken, fulfilling the statutory requirement for seal examination entries.",
          "exact_quote": "Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.",
          "page_reference": null,
          "regulatory_references": [
            {
              "primary_authority_type": "STATUTE",
              "primary_binding_source": "Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1",
              "primary_label": "L1",
              "supporting_authority_type": null,
              "supporting_guideline": null,
              "supporting_label": null
            }
          ],
          "strength_title": "Documentation of Intact Seal Numbers"
        }
      ],
      "deduplicated_flaws": [],
      "detected_language": "English",
      "executive_summary": "The analysis identified 0 legal flaws and 1 legal strength in the reviewed record. No procedural or statutory omissions were detected.",
      "internal_reasoning": "1. CLASSIFY: The document is identified as a 'record'. There are 0 flaws and 1 strength reported in the input findings.\n2. MERGE: There are no flaws to evaluate or merge. The single strength reported evaluates the documentation of unbroken seal numbers, which has no corresponding flaw or conflict, so it is retained.\n3. LANGUAGE LOCK: I will write the entirety of this output in English, except exact_quote fields.\n4. CONSTRUCT: The executive summary will objectively reflect the zero flaws found. The deduplicated_flaws array will be empty with is_flawless set to true, and the consolidated_strengths array will contain the single documented strength.",
      "is_flawless": true
    }

    Körning 3 · Med den sammanslagna rapporten

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document contains a seal entry (SE-208) recording the arrival of a consignment at the north gate, the examination of trailer seals, the identification of seals 30817 and 30818 as unbroken, and the release of the trailer to the holding yard. 2. TRACE: The statement 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken' directly provides the specific seal identifiers and their physical status upon examination. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 ('Examining the seals on a load' [L1]), every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must provide the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The provision further specifies that an entry providing both requirements is to be credited as soundly supported in this respect. The document satisfies all required elements. 4. SYNTHESIZE: There are no legal or procedural flaws identified. A procedural strength is recorded in accordance with L1.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The entry provides the specific identification numbers of the examined seals and confirms that both were found unbroken, fully satisfying the requirement for seal examination entries.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)
    Sammanslagningsanrop
    {
      "consolidated_strengths": [
        {
          "description": "The entry explicitly records the specific identification numbers of the inspected seals and confirms that both were unbroken, complying with procedural requirements for seal examination records.",
          "exact_quote": "Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.",
          "page_reference": null,
          "regulatory_references": [
            {
              "primary_authority_type": "STATUTE",
              "primary_binding_source": "Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1",
              "primary_label": "L1",
              "supporting_authority_type": null,
              "supporting_guideline": null,
              "supporting_label": null
            }
          ],
          "strength_title": "Documented Verification of Seal Identification and Integrity"
        }
      ],
      "deduplicated_flaws": [],
      "detected_language": "English",
      "executive_summary": "The analysis identified 0 legal or procedural flaws across the document. A total of 1 strength was identified regarding compliance with seal examination entry requirements.",
      "internal_reasoning": "1. CLASSIFY: The document type is classified as a record. The input data contains 0 flaws and 1 strength. 2. MERGE: There are no flaws to evaluate or merge. The single strength reported evaluates seal verification compliance under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1, with no conflicting flaws identified. 3. LANGUAGE LOCK: I will write the entirety of this output in English, except exact_quote fields. 4. CONSTRUCT: The executive summary will objectively record 0 flaws identified. The deduplicated_flaws array will be empty, is_flawless will be true, and the consolidated_strengths list will contain the single verified strength.",
      "is_flawless": true
    }

    Körning 4 · Med den sammanslagna rapporten

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record (Seal entry SE-208) containing statements regarding the arrival of a consignment at the north gate, the examination of seals on the trailer, the identification of Seal 30817 and Seal 30818 as unbroken, and the release of the trailer to the holding yard. 2. TRACE: The statement 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate' is directly accompanied by 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 3. EVALUATE: The applicable framework is Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), which stipulates that every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken, crediting an entry that provides both as soundly supported. The document provides the exact seal numbers (30817 and 30818) and confirms their unbroken condition. 4. SYNTHESIZE: No flaws or omissions are present. The entry fully complies with the binding statutory requirement in L1, qualifying as a procedural strength.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The record documents the examination of the trailer's seals and explicitly identifies the individual seal numbers (30817 and 30818) while confirming that each was found unbroken, fulfilling the criteria to be credited as soundly supported under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)
    Sammanslagningsanrop
    {
      "consolidated_strengths": [
        {
          "description": "The record documents the examination of the trailer's seals and explicitly identifies individual seal numbers (30817 and 30818) while confirming that each seal remained unbroken, satisfying the evidentiary standard under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.",
          "exact_quote": "Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.",
          "page_reference": null,
          "regulatory_references": [
            {
              "primary_authority_type": "STATUTE",
              "primary_binding_source": "Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1",
              "primary_label": "L1",
              "supporting_authority_type": null,
              "supporting_guideline": null,
              "supporting_label": null
            }
          ],
          "strength_title": "Documentation of Trailer Seal Verification"
        }
      ],
      "deduplicated_flaws": [],
      "detected_language": "English",
      "executive_summary": "The audit identified a total of 0 legal or procedural flaws across the document. The document is determined to be flawless under the reviewed criteria. A total of 1 legal strength was identified, concerning the specific documentation of physical seals.",
      "internal_reasoning": "1. CLASSIFY: The document is classified as a record. The input data comprises zero flaws and one reported strength concerning the documentation of trailer seals.\n2. MERGE: Flaws: The flaws list is empty; therefore, no flaw merging or deduplication is required. Strengths: Exactly one strength is provided, noting the explicit verification and recording of unbroken seals (30817 and 30818). No conflicting flaws exist, and this strength does not represent an unanchored disclosure or correction; thus, it is retained.\n3. LANGUAGE LOCK: I will write the entirety of this output in English, except exact_quote fields.\n4. CONSTRUCT: The executive summary will objectively present 0 flaws and 1 strength. The is_flawless field will be set to true. The deduplicated_flaws list will be empty, and consolidated_strengths will contain the single processed strength.",
      "is_flawless": true
    }

    Körning 5 · Med den sammanslagna rapporten

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The record includes an entry regarding a seal examination at the gate ('The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.') followed by specific seal details ('Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.'). 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement within the record, the author documents the examination of the trailer seals, specifies the individual seal identifiers (30817 and 30818), and notes their condition upon examination. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), every seal entry in a record stating that seals were examined must provide the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken, with the rule specifying that an entry providing both is to be credited as soundly supported. The document provides both requirements. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry complies with all applicable criteria under L1. No flaws or norm conflicts are present.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The seal entry identifies each seal by number and explicitly records that both seals were found unbroken, satisfying the statutory requirements for recording seal examinations.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)
    Sammanslagningsanrop
    {
      "consolidated_strengths": [
        {
          "description": "The entry explicitly identifies each seal by number and confirms that both were unbroken upon examination, satisfying statutory requirements for recording seal examinations.",
          "exact_quote": "Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.",
          "page_reference": null,
          "regulatory_references": [
            {
              "primary_authority_type": "STATUTE",
              "primary_binding_source": "Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1",
              "primary_label": "L1",
              "supporting_authority_type": null,
              "supporting_guideline": null,
              "supporting_label": null
            }
          ],
          "strength_title": "Accurate Recording and Verification of Seal Integrity"
        }
      ],
      "deduplicated_flaws": [],
      "detected_language": "English",
      "executive_summary": "The investigation identified 0 legal or procedural flaws. A total of 1 legal strength was identified regarding the documentation and verification of seal integrity.",
      "internal_reasoning": "1. CLASSIFY: The document under review is a record. The input contains 0 flaws and 1 legal strength. 2. MERGE: There are no flaws to consolidate. The single reported strength regarding the explicit verification and recording of unbroken seal numbers does not conflict with any reported flaw and is retained. 3. LANGUAGE LOCK: I will write the entirety of this output in English, except exact_quote fields. 4. CONSTRUCT: The executive summary will objectively state that zero flaws were identified. The deduplicated flaws array will be empty, is_flawless will be true, and the consolidated strengths array will contain the single verified strength.",
      "is_flawless": true
    }
  2. Schemalagd nattkörning,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren
    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The record 'Seal entry SE-208' contains a section 'Seal examination' stating 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' and 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 2. TRACE: The examination claims are recorded directly by the author of the record regarding the consignment at the gate. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (law L1), every seal entry stating that the seals on a load were examined must specify the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The record lists both seal numbers (30817 and 30818) and confirms that both were found unbroken. Law L1 provides that an entry providing both details is to be credited as soundly supported in this respect. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The record fully satisfies the requirements of law L1. No flaws are identified, and the compliance is documented as a procedural strength.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The seal entry specifies the individual numbers of the examined seals and confirms that each seal was found unbroken, fulfilling the record-keeping requirements for examined load seals.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)
  3. Schemalagd nattkörning,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren
    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record documenting the arrival of a consignment at the north gate. It contains a section titled 'Seal examination' stating 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' and 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 2. TRACE: The seal examination entry specifies that two seals (seal 30817 and seal 30818) were examined on the trailer and documents that both were found unbroken. 3. EVALUATE: The applicable binding rule, Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), mandates that in a record, every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken, and explicitly provides that an entry providing both is to be credited as soundly supported in this respect. The record contains both the seal numbers and confirmation of unbroken status for all examined seals. No procedural or substantive flaws are present under the provided legal framework. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Document compliance as a procedural strength under L1. No flaws or norm conflicts are present.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The record provides the specific number of each seal examined on the trailer and explicitly states that both were found unbroken, in full compliance with the requirement that every seal examination entry record each seal number and whether it was unbroken.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)
  4. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The author records that a trailer arrived at the north gate, that the seals on the trailer were examined at the gate, that seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken, and that the trailer was released to the holding yard. 2. TRACE: Tracing the seal examination entry against the legal framework (L1: Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1, 'Examining the seals on a load'), the framework requires that in a record, every seal entry stating that the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. It specifically notes that an entry giving both is to be credited as soundly supported. 3. EVALUATE: The text states that the trailer's seals were examined and directly provides the specific seal numbers ('Seal 30817 and seal 30818') as well as their condition ('were both found unbroken'). This fully meets the legal requirement set out in L1. No flaws or norm conflicts are present. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a procedural strength crediting the soundly supported seal examination under L1, and output empty lists for flaws and norm conflicts.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The record documents the examination of the load's seals by specifying each seal number and confirming that both were found unbroken, fully satisfying the requirement to record both pieces of information.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scanned the document for all statements regarding the examination of seals. The document contains the section 'Seal examination' with the statements: 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' and 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 2. TRACE: Traced the statements to verify if they fulfill the specific statutory requirement set out in Law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1). 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated the text against Law L1, which requires that every seal entry stating seals were examined must provide the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The text specifies the numbers of both seals ('Seal 30817 and seal 30818') and explicitly confirms their condition ('were both found unbroken'). Per Law L1, an entry providing both must be credited as soundly supported in this respect. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Identified no procedural or legal flaws. Formulated one procedural strength confirming full compliance with Law L1.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The seal entry provides the identification number for each examined seal and explicitly records that each was found unbroken, fulfilling the requirements of the applicable practice schedule.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document contains a record of trailer arrival, seal inspection, and yard release. Specifically, under 'Seal examination', it states: 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' followed by 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the examination record reveals that the author identified that the seals were examined, recorded the specific seal numbers (30817 and 30818), and documented their physical status as unbroken. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (Examining the seals on a load), every seal entry stating that seals were examined must provide the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken, with the rule explicitly directing that an entry providing both is to be credited as soundly supported. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry fully complies with the binding legal requirement by stating both the seal numbers and their unbroken status. There are no procedural or legal flaws. This constitutes a procedural strength under L1.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The record provides the specific identification numbers of the seals and confirms that they were found unbroken upon examination, fulfilling the statutory requirement that seal examination entries record the seal numbers and confirm whether they were unbroken.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Sida:
    Throughout
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1, Examining the seals on a load (STATUTE)
  5. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The record 'Seal entry SE-208' contains an entry under the heading 'Seal examination' stating that the seals on the trailer were examined at the gate, followed by the specific statement: 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement within the record, the author documented the arrival of the trailer, the examination of its seals, the exact identifiers of the seals (30817 and 30818), and their unbroken condition prior to release to the holding yard. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (law ID L1), every seal entry in a record indicating that the seals on a load were examined must give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The provision further directs that an entry providing both details is to be credited as soundly supported. The document author provided both required elements. No procedural or substantive omissions or flaws are present. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry fully complies with the binding requirement in L1, qualifying as a procedural strength with zero identified flaws.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The record documents the examination of the load's seals and explicitly lists each seal number along with confirmation that each was found unbroken, fulfilling the criteria for a soundly supported entry.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Sida:
    Throughout
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document contains a record of a seal entry (SE-208) stating that a trailer arrived at the north gate, the seals were examined at the gate, seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken, and the trailer was released to the holding yard. 2. TRACE: The statement that the seals were examined is followed immediately by the identification of the specific seal numbers (30817 and 30818) and the determination of their state (both found unbroken). 3. EVALUATE: Under Law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1), every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must provide the number of each seal and confirm whether it was found unbroken. An entry satisfying both requirements must be credited as soundly supported in this respect. The record contains both required elements. 4. SYNTHESIZE: No legal or procedural flaws are present. The entry satisfies the statutory requirement and is credited as a procedural strength pursuant to L1.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The seal entry specifies the number of each examined seal and confirms that both were found unbroken, fully complying with the statutory requirement to record both items and qualifying the entry to be credited as soundly supported.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document contains a record entry regarding the examination of seals on a trailer arriving at the north gate: 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate. Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement within the record, the author documents the specific seal identification numbers (30817 and 30818) and records their condition upon examination at the gate. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), every seal entry in a record that states the seals on a load were examined must give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. An entry providing both must be credited as soundly supported in this respect. The entry satisfies both requirements. No procedural or legal deviations from the provided legal framework exist. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The record complies fully with the applicable binding rule L1. There are no flaws or norm conflicts to report, and one procedural strength is identified.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The seal entry provides the specific identification numbers of all examined seals (30817 and 30818) and confirms that both were found unbroken, fully satisfying the requirement for seal examination records.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Sida:
    Throughout
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)
  6. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren2 olika uppsättningar fynd över körningarna
    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: inte hittad, men regeln nämndes i ett annat fynd
    1 ostödd styrka
    • Hänvisade till: Regel A

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Vad varierade mellan körningarna

    Fynd som vissa körningar gav och andra inte. Varje länk går till motorns svar i den körningen.

    Endast granskaren

    • Förväntat fynd seals-numbered-and-stated: Styrka, hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel I: Körning 1, Körning 2
    • Förväntat fynd seals-numbered-and-stated: Styrka, inte hittad, men regeln nämndes i ett annat fynd I: Körning 3
    • Ostödd styrka. Hänvisade till: Regel A. På ett eget citat som facit inte pekar ut I: Körning 3
    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document contains a seal entry (SE-208) recording that 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' and 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the claim backward, the record documents the specific seal identifiers (30817 and 30818) and explicitly states the outcome of the inspection ('were both found unbroken'). 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), every seal entry stating that the seals on a load were examined must give the number of each seal and confirm whether it was found unbroken. The provision stipulates that an entry meeting both criteria is to be credited as soundly supported. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry fully complies with the statutory requirement by providing the seal numbers and confirming unbroken status. No legal or procedural flaws exist, and a procedural strength is recorded accordingly.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The seal entry provides the specific number of each examined seal and explicitly confirms that each was found unbroken, fulfilling the criteria to be credited as soundly supported.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document contains a record of a seal entry (SE-208) stating: 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate. Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the examination record, it specifies the individual seal identifiers (30817 and 30818) and documents their condition upon inspection ('were both found unbroken'). 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (Examining the seals on a load), every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must provide the number of each seal and declare whether it was found unbroken. The provision further specifies that an entry providing both elements is to be credited as soundly supported. The document provides both required elements. 4. SYNTHESIZE: No legal or procedural flaws are present. The compliant documentation constitutes a procedural strength under Law L1.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The seal entry specifies the identification numbers of each examined seal and explicitly confirms that both were found unbroken, fulfilling the requirements for sound support under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scanning the record reveals the following key statements: (a) arrival of a trailer of boxed pipe fittings at the north gate, (b) examination of trailer seals at the gate, (c) identification of Seal 30817 and Seal 30818 and confirmation that both were found unbroken, and (d) release of the trailer to the holding yard. 2. TRACE: Tracing the examination and seal verification claims in the record shows that the author explicitly documented the examination of the load's seals at the gate and recorded the specific seal numbers (30817 and 30818) alongside their condition ('were both found unbroken'). 3. EVALUATE: Evaluating this against the assigned legal framework (Law L1: Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1, 'Examining the seals on a load'): The rule requires that in a record, every seal entry stating that the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. Law L1 mandates that an entry giving both is to be credited as soundly supported. The document meets all these conditions completely. 4. SYNTHESIZE: No legal flaws or omissions are present under the provided legal framework. The complete recording of seal numbers and confirmation of unbroken status constitutes a procedural strength under Law L1.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The seal entry records the examination of the trailer seals and explicitly provides the number of each seal (30817 and 30818) while confirming that both were found unbroken, satisfying the statutory requirement for sound support.
    Citat
    The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate. Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Sida:
    Throughout
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)
  7. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren2 olika uppsättningar fynd över körningarna
    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: inte hittad, men regeln nämndes i ett annat fynd
    1 ostödd styrka
    • Hänvisade till: Regel A

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: inte hittad, men regeln nämndes i ett annat fynd
    1 ostödd styrka
    • Hänvisade till: Regel A

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Vad varierade mellan körningarna

    Fynd som vissa körningar gav och andra inte. Varje länk går till motorns svar i den körningen.

    Endast granskaren

    • Förväntat fynd seals-numbered-and-stated: Styrka, hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel I: Körning 1
    • Förväntat fynd seals-numbered-and-stated: Styrka, inte hittad, men regeln nämndes i ett annat fynd I: Körning 2, Körning 3
    • Ostödd styrka. Hänvisade till: Regel A. På ett eget citat som facit inte pekar ut I: Körning 2, Körning 3
    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Identify all causal claims, factual conclusions, and diagnostic statements in the document. The text consists of a record (Seal entry SE-208) containing: 'A trailer of boxed pipe fittings arrived at the north gate.', 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.', 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.', and 'The trailer was released to the holding yard.' 2. TRACE: Trace the origins and elements of each statement. The record documents the gate arrival, seal examination, specific seal numbers and condition, and subsequent release to the holding yard. 3. EVALUATE: Compare against the legal framework. Law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1, 'Examining the seals on a load') mandates that in a record, every seal entry that says the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and say whether it was found unbroken. The document states that the seals were examined, identifies each seal by number ('Seal 30817 and seal 30818'), and explicitly states that both were found unbroken. According to Law L1, an entry providing both is to be credited as soundly supported. There are no procedural deviations or legal flaws present. 4. SYNTHESIZE: No legal flaws exist. The record fully complies with the statutory requirement set out in Law L1, constituting a procedural strength.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The record documents the examination of the trailer seals, provides the specific identification numbers of each seal, and confirms that they were found unbroken, fulfilling all requirements of the applicable rule to be credited as soundly supported.
    Citat
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record entitled 'Seal entry SE-208' documenting the arrival of a trailer of boxed pipe fittings, stating 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' followed by 'Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.' and noting release to the yard. 2. TRACE: The statement regarding the examination of the seals on the load is documented alongside specific seal identifiers (30817 and 30818) and their physical integrity status ('found unbroken'). 3. EVALUATE: Under L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1), when a seal entry in a record states that the seals on a load were examined, the author must give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. L1 explicitly states that an entry providing both details is to be credited as soundly supported in this respect. The text fulfills both requirements by providing the seal numbers (30817 and 30818) and noting that both were found unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: No legal flaws or omissions were identified. The entry directly satisfies the statutory requirements under L1, qualifying as a procedural strength.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The seal entry documents the examination of the trailer seals while providing the number of each seal (30817 and 30818) and confirming that each was found unbroken, in full accordance with the required recording standard.
    Citat
    The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate. Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Sida:
    Throughout
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The record includes an entry stating that trailer seals were examined at the gate ('The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.') and identifies the seals and their condition ('Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.'). 2. TRACE: The statement directly gives the specific seal numbers (30817 and 30818) and confirms their physical state upon examination (unbroken). 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), every seal entry in a record stating that seals on a load were examined must provide the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The document provides both seal numbers (30817 and 30818) and affirms that each was found unbroken. Furthermore, L1 provides that an entry satisfying both requirements is to be credited as soundly supported. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The document fully complies with the mandatory requirements of L1 without any procedural or substantive omissions. Therefore, no flaws are identified, and the compliance is documented as a strength.

    0 brister rapporterade

    1 styrka rapporterad

    Förklaring
    The author documented the examination of the load's seals by specifying each seal number and confirming that both seals were found unbroken, fulfilling the procedural requirements for seal entries.
    Citat
    The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate. Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Sida:
    Throughout
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

Kontroll: motorn körd med fel regler

Visas skild från resultaten. Motorn fick ett annat falls regler, så varje fynd nedan är ett fynd mot regler som inte gäller det här dokumentet.

  1. Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1
    Bedömt mot version 2Endast granskaren
    • seals-numbered-and-stated Styrka: missad

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Rent testfall: godkänt, ingen brist rapporterades

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The record contains entries regarding the arrival of a trailer with pipe fittings at the north gate, examination of seals (30817 and 30818) found unbroken, and release of the trailer to the holding yard. 2. TRACE: There is no entry stating that a request was refused. 3. EVALUATE: Law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part M, issue 1) requires that every allocation entry stating a request was refused must specify which requirement the request failed to meet. Since no request was refused in the document, this requirement is not triggered. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The document complies with the provided legal framework and contains no identified flaws, norm conflicts, or specific strengths mapped to L1.

    0 brister rapporterade

    0 styrkor rapporterade

Tidigare versioner av det här testfallet

En rättad grupp publiceras bredvid den version som tidigare resultat bedömdes mot.

Gruppversion 1

Vad det här testfallet ändrar

Faktor
seal numbers and state after the examination
Nivå
present
Jämförs med
seal-detail-missingÄndringen ska ändra svaret. Ett textställe i dokumentet skiljer sig mellan de två.

The entry gives each seal's number and says both were unbroken.

Dokumentet motorn fick

Exakt den text motorn fick, rad för rad.

  1. Seal entry SE-208
  2. Consignment at the gate
  3. A trailer of boxed pipe fittings arrived at the north gate.
  4. Seal examination
  5. The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.
  6. Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
  7. Release to the yard
  8. The trailer was released to the holding yard.

Reglerna motorn fick

Varje regel visas under en neutral beteckning i stället för sitt interna namn.

  • Regel A

    Examining the seals on a load

    Källa: Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1

    In a record, every seal entry that says the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and say whether it was found unbroken. The duty rests on the author of the record. An entry that gives both is to be credited as soundly supported in this respect.

Facit

Skrevs ner innan motorn kördes. seal-detail-given-truth

The examination is recorded with each seal's number and state, which the rule says is to be credited, and no flaw.

Facit är uttömmande: varje fynd som inte står som förväntat räknas som fel.

Förväntade fynd

  • StyrkaFynd seals-numbered-and-stated

    The entry gives the number of each seal and says each was unbroken, which the rule says is to be credited.

    Ska förankras i
    Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.
    Ska hänvisa till
    Regel A
    Kontrolleras i
    granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten

Förbjudna fynd

Fel svar, nedskrivna i förväg.

  • BristUtelämnandeFynd false-bare-seal-examination

    Reporting the examination as missing its detail when the entry gives it is a false positive.

    Ska förankras i
    The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.
    Ska hänvisa till
    Regel A
    Kontrolleras i
    granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten

Vad den blinda läsaren svarade

En AI-läsare fick det här dokumentet och dess regler, men inte facit, och svarade på egen hand. Jämför svaret med facit ovan.

  • Överens med facitClaude, 23 september 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-16
    • StyrkaRegel A

      Ska förankras i Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.

  • Överens med facitGemini, 4 oktober 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-13
    • StyrkaRegel A

      Ska förankras i Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken.

Kritisk granskning av facit

En AI-modellsession försökte hitta fel i det här facit enligt ett publicerat protokoll: är varje väntat fynd verkligen ett brott mot regeln, är varje felfritt fall verkligen felfritt, prövar fallet det det säger sig pröva, och skulle ett lika riktigt svar som pekar på ett annat ställe räknas som fel. Den tittade inte på motorns resultat först. Varje invändning visas med hur den avgjordes. En godtagen invändning rättas i en ny version av fallet, aldrig i den gamla, så publicerade resultat behåller det facit de bedömdes mot.

Granskning av Claude, 4 oktober 2026

  • Facit svagtFörankringRegel Ap1 · seals-numbered-and-stated

    The expected strength is anchored on "Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken." alone. The examination rule A credits is stated across two lines: the claim "The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate." and the detail below it. A strength quoting the examination sentence, or both sentences, is as correct as the key's, but the scorer accepts a wider quote only on the anchor's own line, so either answer is scored as a missed target and an unsupported strength.

    Godtagen, rättelse väntar · rättelsen följs upp i #3074

    A correct answer must not be scored as two errors. The family is corrected under a new version in which the examination and its detail are one sentence the strength can be anchored on.

  • Invändning besvaradFullständighetRegel Ap2 · seal-detail-given-truth

    Rule A asks for "the number of each seal". The entry never says how many seals the trailer carried, so it cannot show that two numbers are all of them.

    Facit står kvar

    The entry names two seals and says "both", which closes the set in its own words, and nothing in the document suggests a third. Demanding a count beyond that would read a requirement into rule A that its text does not hold.

  • Invändning besvaradGiltighetRegel Ap4 · seal-detail-presence

    Gäller hela gruppen av fall

    The strength is due only because rule A ends by saying such an entry "is to be credited". The case tests whether the engine follows an explicit instruction to credit, not whether it recognises a well-grounded step unprompted.

    Facit står kvar

    That is the suite's deliberate rule: a strength is due only under a rule whose text says so (REGRESSION_CORPUS.md, Authoring decisions), so that a clean document is never punished for an unasked credit. The hypothesis is about crediting under such a rule.

  • Invändning besvaradSvårighetp5 · seal-detail-presence

    Gäller hela gruppen av fall

    Seal numbers are the only digits in the examination section, so their presence decides both sides of the contrast.

    Facit står kvar

    The suite is a change gate whose shapes and size are fixed to the pilot's measured cost (REGRESSION_CORPUS.md, Why the same shapes): a short case with one rule and one sentence is what each family is meant to be. Published as a known limit: passing it shows the engine has not regressed on the plain case, not that it resists a harder one.

Testets instruktion till granskaren

Testkonfigurationen gav AI-granskaren den här instruktionen vid sidan av reglerna. Det är testets egen instruktion. Produktionens systemprompt visas inte.

You read one document and apply only the rules supplied to you in the legal framework, exactly as each rule is written. Report every place where the document does not meet a supplied rule, and apply what a supplied rule says about how a record that meets it is to be recorded. Quote each passage exactly as it appears. Do not apply a rule that was not supplied, and do not rely on any knowledge of a legal system.

Vem som skrev och läste det här testfallet

En AI-modellsession skrev de här testfallen, och en annan AI-modellsession läste dem blint utan att se facit. Ingen människa har granskat dem.

Skrevs
, registrerat som Verkstaden implementer (Claude Local), #2323
Modellfamilj som skrev det
Claude
Varför det skrevs
Authored for #2323 as new REGRESSION material in the outcome shapes of the controlled-pilot suite, sharing none of its text. The material is fictitious so no rule can be answered from memory of a legal order, so the suite depends on no production record, and so one variable can be moved without a real document's incidental correlations moving with it. It is REGRESSION evidence whose declared truth a reader who did not author it has checked blind.

Granskning

Skrivna av en AI-modellsession: Claude.

  • Blind läsning, Claude, 23 september 2026: 22 av 22 överens

    registrerat som Verkstaden orchestrator session (Claude Opus 5.5), blind read

    Ingen oenighet med facit.

    Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall
  • Blind läsning, Gemini, 4 oktober 2026: 19 av 22 överens

    registrerat som gemini-2.5-pro (Vertex europe-west1), blind read

    3 oenigheter med facit
    • Punkt item-06

      The reader found the closure entry's missing statement of where its papers are stored, as declared, but placed it under the "Closing note" heading; the key places it under no section.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Genuinely ambiguous: the rule attaches the duty to the whole entry, but a closing note is a natural home for it, and the packet does not say which. Kept as declared; #3082 sharpens the case.

    • Punkt item-07

      The reader agreed nothing is due for the sample run from a tap, but gave the reason as a condition not triggered; the key declares the sample out of the rule's scope.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Genuinely ambiguous: the packet names the four reasons without defining them, and the rule's wording reads both as a scope limit and as an unmet condition. Kept as declared; #3083 sharpens the reasons.

    • Punkt item-17

      The reader found the levy charged from a figure with no named document, as declared, but quoted the sentence that sets the levy; the key anchors the flaw on the sentence that states the figure.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Reader wrong: the rule's duty attaches to the figure ("a figure whose document is not named"), and the packet anchors an unsupported claim on the claim itself, which here is the figure, not the charge set from it.

    Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall
  • Kritisk granskning, Claude, 4 oktober 2026: 1 invändning

    registrerat som Claude Project thread session for #3049, adversarial critique

    1 oenighet med facit
    • Punkt p1 (seal-detail-given, seals-numbered-and-stated)

      KEY_WEAK, ANCHORING: The expected strength is anchored on "Seal 30817 and seal 30818 were both found unbroken." alone. The examination rule A credits is stated across two lines: the claim "The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate." and the detail below it. A strength quoting the examination sentence, or both sentences, is as correct as the key's, but the scorer accepts a wider quote only on the anchor's own line, so either answer is scored as a missed target and an unsupported strength.

      Hur den avgjordes

      ACCEPTED: A correct answer must not be scored as two errors. The family is corrected under a new version in which the examination and its detail are one sentence the strength can be anchored on. Follow-up #3074.

AI-modeller skrev och granskade de här testfallen, som anges ovan. Ingen människa har granskat dem. Varje oenighet mellan en AI-granskare och facit publiceras här.

Fingeravtryck

SHA-256-hashvärden som en läsare kan jämföra med en publicerad körnings rapport.

Dokument
94fbb4219398f3f7ae811e9f7f4906e21cd2f1050952f70e24f6e8e9e0de8b51
Dokumentmall
ee4f1c80fc60c7ac17feddb0303f35f92e1fdf286dfbd6c7b56fbb685065d2da
Regel A
332375509a8078159cf95e0cc3a2479d9248fc4178c5af0762ba838646c75ff1