seal-detail-missing

Resultat i publicerade körningar

Senaste först. Varje kolumn är en körning av det här testfallet.

1. Mätkörning med releasedesignen, ingen release, 5 oktober 2026

   Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.

   Testfall	Körning 1	Körning 2	Körning 3	Körning 4	Körning 5
   Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart
   Bedömt mot version 1Med den sammanslagna rapportenGranskare: Samma fynd i varje körningSammanslagen rapport: Samma fynd i varje körning	Granskare seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart Sammanslagen rapport seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	Granskare seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart Sammanslagen rapport seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	Granskare seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart Sammanslagen rapport seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	Granskare seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart Sammanslagen rapport seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	Granskare seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart Sammanslagen rapport seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

   Se motorns egna svar

   Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

   System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

   Körning 1

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: The document contains a record entry titled 'Seal entry SE-208' documenting a consignment arrival, seal examination, and release. Under the heading 'Seal examination', the investigator/author states: 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement regarding seal examination back to the legal framework, 'Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1' (L1) governs records where seal entries state that seals on a load were examined. 3. EVALUATE: According to L1, every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The author places the statement that seals were examined but fails to provide the seal numbers and fails to record whether they were unbroken. This constitutes an omission on a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM). 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate one flaw under L1 for missing required seal details in the seal examination entry. No procedural strengths or norm conflicts are present.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Omission of seal details

   Förklaring

   The seal entry states that the seals on the trailer were examined at the gate, but fails to provide the number of each seal and does not state whether each seal was found unbroken, as required by the Entry Practice Schedule.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Körning 2

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: The document is a record titled 'Seal entry SE-208'. Under the heading 'Seal examination', it states: 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' No seal numbers or integrity statuses (whether unbroken) are mentioned. 2. TRACE: The statement that the seals on the trailer were examined is recorded directly by the author of the record. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), every seal entry in a record that states the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The text claims the seals were examined but omits the seal numbers and whether they were found unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry fails to provide the required seal numbers and integrity determination. This is an omission on a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM). No procedural strengths or norm conflicts are present.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Incomplete seal record

   Förklaring

   The seal entry records that the seals on the trailer were examined, but omits the number of each seal and fails to state whether each seal was found unbroken, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Körning 3

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: Scan the record for all statements concerning seal examination and consignment handling. The record contains the entry 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' under the heading 'Seal examination'. 2. TRACE: Trace this entry to identify its content and requirements. The text records the fact of examination but does not state the numbers of the seals or whether they were found unbroken. 3. EVALUATE: Compare the entry against the legal framework in Law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1, 'Examining the seals on a load'). Law L1 establishes a binding duty on the author of a record: every seal entry stating that the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The text omits both required elements. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry fails to meet the mandatory recording requirements of Law L1. This constitutes an omission with a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM). No other legal provisions are engaged, and no strengths or norm conflicts are present.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Incomplete seal examination record

   Förklaring

   The seal entry records that the seals on the trailer were examined, but fails to provide the number of each seal and whether each seal was found unbroken, contrary to the mandatory requirements for seal examination entries in a record.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Körning 4

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: Identified the causal/factual claim regarding seal inspection under the heading 'Seal examination': 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' 2. TRACE: Traced the seal examination entry to verify whether it meets all mandatory elements required by the governing standard. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), every seal entry in a record that states seals were examined must specify the number of each seal and declare whether it was found unbroken. The text states that the seals were examined, but omits the seal numbers and whether they were found unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulated one omission flaw (STATED_CLAIM) anchored on L1 for failing to record seal numbers and seal condition status. No strengths or norm conflicts are present.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Incomplete seal record

   Förklaring

   The seal entry records that the seals on the trailer were examined, but omits the number of each seal and does not state whether each seal was found unbroken, contrary to the mandatory recording requirements of Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Körning 5

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: Scanning the document reveals the factual statement under heading 'Seal examination': 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' 2. TRACE: This statement is an examination record made by the author of the seal entry SE-208 for the arrival of trailer pipe fittings. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluating this claim against the binding law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1, 'Examining the seals on a load'): the law mandates that in a record, every seal entry stating that seals were examined must specify the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The entry states that seals were examined but completely omits the seal numbers and the unbroken status. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate one flaw object for an omission (STATED_CLAIM) where the required specific details are missing from the stated seal examination claim. There are no strengths to credit and no norm conflicts.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Incomplete seal record

   Förklaring

   The record states that the seals on the trailer were examined, but omits the number of each seal and whether each seal was found unbroken, violating the explicit requirement of the Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Körning 1 · Med den sammanslagna rapporten

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: Identified the claim under 'Seal examination' stating 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' 2. TRACE: The statement is recorded by the author of the seal entry SE-208 in a record document. 3. EVALUATE: Assessed against binding law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1), which mandates that every seal entry stating seals were examined must also provide the number of each seal and state whether each was found unbroken. The record omits both the seal numbers and their unbroken status. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Document non-compliance as an omission (STATED_CLAIM) anchored to L1.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Incomplete seal record

   Förklaring

   The seal entry states that the seals on the trailer were examined, but fails to state the number of each seal and whether each seal was found unbroken, as required by the Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Sammanslagningsanrop

   {
     "consolidated_strengths": [],
     "deduplicated_flaws": [
       {
         "description": "The seal entry documents that the trailer seals were examined at the gate but fails to specify the individual seal numbers and whether each seal was verified as intact and unbroken.",
         "exact_quote": "The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.",
         "flaw_title": "Omission of seal numbers and integrity status in examination record",
         "is_omission": true,
         "page_reference": null,
         "regulatory_references": [
           {
             "primary_authority_type": "STATUTE",
             "primary_binding_source": "Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1",
             "primary_label": "L1",
             "supporting_authority_type": null,
             "supporting_guideline": null,
             "supporting_label": null
           }
         ],
         "source_flaw_ids": [
           "FLAW-1"
         ]
       }
     ],
     "detected_language": "English",
     "executive_summary": "The compliance audit identified 1 procedural flaw across the reviewed documentation and 0 strengths. The single flaw is categorized under Incomplete seal record.",
     "internal_reasoning": "1. CLASSIFY: The document under review is classified as a record. The input dataset contains 1 flaw and 0 strengths. 2. MERGE: There is a single flaw, FLAW-1, describing an incomplete seal record where seal numbers and condition were omitted. No duplicate findings exist, so FLAW-1 is preserved with a 1:1 mapping in source_flaw_ids. 3. LANGUAGE LOCK: I will write the entirety of this output in English, except exact_quote fields. 4. CONSTRUCT: The executive summary will objectively record 1 flaw concerning record completeness and 0 strengths. The deduplicated flaws list will contain FLAW-1, and consolidated strengths will be empty.",
     "is_flawless": false
   }

   Körning 2 · Med den sammanslagna rapporten

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: The document contains a record of consignment arrival and seal examination: 'A trailer of boxed pipe fittings arrived at the north gate.' under 'Consignment at the gate', 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' under 'Seal examination', and 'The trailer was released to the holding yard.' under 'Release to the yard'. 2. TRACE: The statement 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' records that the seals on the load were examined. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (law id 'L1'), every seal entry in a record stating that seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The text records the examination but completely lacks the seal numbers and any statement on whether the seals were found unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw for the omission of mandatory seal details (seal numbers and unbroken status) in a stated seal examination entry, referenced to L1.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Incomplete seal examination record

   Förklaring

   The seal entry states that the seals on the trailer were examined at the gate but does not state the number of each seal nor whether each seal was found unbroken, contrary to the mandatory requirement for seal entries.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Sammanslagningsanrop

   {
     "consolidated_strengths": [],
     "deduplicated_flaws": [
       {
         "description": "The seal entry indicates that the trailer seals were examined at the gate, but omits the specific identification number of each seal and fails to record whether each seal was intact and unbroken, contrary to mandatory requirements.",
         "exact_quote": "The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.",
         "flaw_title": "Incomplete Seal Examination Record",
         "is_omission": true,
         "page_reference": null,
         "regulatory_references": [
           {
             "primary_authority_type": "STATUTE",
             "primary_binding_source": "Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1",
             "primary_label": "L1",
             "supporting_authority_type": null,
             "supporting_guideline": null,
             "supporting_label": null
           }
         ],
         "source_flaw_ids": [
           "FLAW-1"
         ]
       }
     ],
     "detected_language": "English",
     "executive_summary": "The audit identified 1 procedural flaw in the record. The flaw falls under the category of incomplete seal examination records. Zero strengths were identified.",
     "internal_reasoning": "1. CLASSIFY: The document type is classified as a \"record\". The input findings consist of a single flaw (FLAW-1) concerning an incomplete seal examination entry and zero identified strengths. 2. MERGE: There is only one flaw reported (FLAW-1), so no merging or deduplication across multiple items is required. FLAW-1 maps 1:1 to the consolidated flaws list. There are no strengths to evaluate or conflict-check. 3. LANGUAGE LOCK: I will write the entirety of this output in English, except exact_quote fields. 4. CONSTRUCT: The executive summary will objectively describe the single flaw found. The deduplicated_flaws list will contain 1 item with source_flaw_ids [\"FLAW-1\"], preserving the exact quote verbatim.",
     "is_flawless": false
   }

   Körning 3 · Med den sammanslagna rapporten

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: The document contains a factual statement under the heading 'Seal examination' stating 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' 2. TRACE: This entry records the examination of seals on a trailer consignment. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), in a record, every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The document states that the seals were examined but omits the seal numbers and whether the seals were unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a flaw for the omission of required seal numbers and unbroken status under L1.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Omission of required seal details

   Förklaring

   The seal entry states that the seals on the trailer were examined, but fails to provide the number of each seal and whether each seal was found unbroken, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Sammanslagningsanrop

   {
     "consolidated_strengths": [],
     "deduplicated_flaws": [
       {
         "description": "The record notes that trailer seals were examined but fails to record the specific identification number of each seal and whether each seal was intact upon examination.",
         "exact_quote": "The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.",
         "flaw_title": "Omission of seal numbers and condition verification",
         "is_omission": true,
         "page_reference": null,
         "regulatory_references": [
           {
             "primary_authority_type": "STATUTE",
             "primary_binding_source": "Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1",
             "primary_label": "L1",
             "supporting_authority_type": null,
             "supporting_guideline": null,
             "supporting_label": null
           }
         ],
         "source_flaw_ids": [
           "FLAW-1"
         ]
       }
     ],
     "detected_language": "English",
     "executive_summary": "The analysis identified 1 legal flaw and 0 strengths. The single flaw pertains to the omission of required seal details in the record.",
     "internal_reasoning": "1. CLASSIFY: The document type is a record. The input contains 1 raw flaw (FLAW-1) and 0 strengths. 2. MERGE: FLAW-1 is the only identified flaw, representing an omission of required seal numbers and integrity status. No merging is necessary as there are no duplicate findings; FLAW-1 maps 1:1. 3. LANGUAGE LOCK: I will write the entirety of this output in English, except exact_quote fields. 4. CONSTRUCT: The executive summary will objectively state that 1 flaw was identified regarding omitted seal details, and no strengths were recorded. The consolidated flaw list will contain 1 item with source_flaw_ids [\"FLAW-1\"].",
     "is_flawless": false
   }

   Körning 4 · Med den sammanslagna rapporten

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: Scanned the document for all statements regarding seal examination. Under the heading 'Seal examination', the text states: 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' 2. TRACE: Traced the entry to determine if details regarding the seal identification numbers and integrity status were provided. No seal numbers or unbroken statuses are mentioned in the entry or throughout the document. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated the statement against L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1, 'Examining the seals on a load'). L1 explicitly mandates that in a record, every seal entry stating that the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The text fails to provide both required elements. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Documented this deficiency as a stated claim omission under L1. No procedural strengths or norm conflicts are present.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Omission of seal numbers and integrity status

   Förklaring

   The seal entry states that the seals on the trailer were examined, but fails to provide the number of each seal and state whether each seal was found unbroken as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Sammanslagningsanrop

   {
     "consolidated_strengths": [],
     "deduplicated_flaws": [
       {
         "description": "The entry notes that the trailer seals were examined at the gate but omits the specific identification number of each seal and fails to state whether each seal was intact.",
         "exact_quote": "The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.",
         "flaw_title": "Omission of Seal Identification Numbers and Integrity Status",
         "is_omission": true,
         "page_reference": null,
         "regulatory_references": [
           {
             "primary_authority_type": "STATUTE",
             "primary_binding_source": "Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1",
             "primary_label": "L1",
             "supporting_authority_type": null,
             "supporting_guideline": null,
             "supporting_label": null
           }
         ],
         "source_flaw_ids": [
           "FLAW-1"
         ]
       }
     ],
     "detected_language": "English",
     "executive_summary": "The audit identified 1 legal flaw and 0 strengths. The flaw pertains to the omission of seal identification numbers and integrity status.",
     "internal_reasoning": "1. CLASSIFY: The document under review is classified as a record. The input dataset contains 1 flaw and 0 strengths. 2. MERGE: There is only one reported flaw (FLAW-1) detailing an omission of seal numbers and seal integrity confirmation. No deduplication or merging across multiple findings is required; FLAW-1 maps 1:1. 3. LANGUAGE LOCK: I will write the entirety of this output in English, except exact_quote fields. 4. CONSTRUCT: The executive summary will objectively record 1 flaw. The deduplicated flaws list will contain FLAW-1 with traceability, and the consolidated strengths list will remain empty.",
     "is_flawless": false
   }

   Körning 5 · Med den sammanslagna rapporten

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: The document is a record entitled 'Seal entry SE-208'. Under the heading 'Seal examination', the author states: 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' 2. TRACE: Tracing this entry, the investigator/author records the examination of seals on a trailer carrying boxed pipe fittings at the north gate. 3. EVALUATE: According to the binding law (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 [L1]), 'every seal entry that says the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and say whether it was found unbroken. The duty rests on the author of the record.' The record states that the seals were examined, but fails to provide the number of each seal and fails to specify whether any seal was found unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: This constitutes an omission on a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM), as the claim of examination is made but the mandatory required details (seal numbers and condition as unbroken) are omitted. No procedural strengths meeting the criteria are present, and no norm conflicts exist.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Incomplete seal record

   Förklaring

   The seal entry records that the seals on the trailer were examined at the gate, but fails to give the number of each seal and does not state whether each seal was found unbroken, contrary to the requirements of Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Sammanslagningsanrop

   {
     "consolidated_strengths": [],
     "deduplicated_flaws": [
       {
         "description": "The seal entry records that the trailer seals were examined at the gate, but it fails to record the specific number of each seal and does not state whether each seal was intact and unbroken.",
         "exact_quote": "The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.",
         "flaw_title": "Omission of Seal Identification Numbers and Condition",
         "is_omission": true,
         "page_reference": null,
         "regulatory_references": [
           {
             "primary_authority_type": "STATUTE",
             "primary_binding_source": "Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1",
             "primary_label": "L1",
             "supporting_authority_type": null,
             "supporting_guideline": null,
             "supporting_label": null
           }
         ],
         "source_flaw_ids": [
           "FLAW-1"
         ]
       }
     ],
     "detected_language": "English",
     "executive_summary": "The audit identified 1 legal flaw and 0 strengths. The identified flaw falls under the category of incomplete seal records, specifically the omission of seal numbers and verification of seal condition.",
     "internal_reasoning": "1. CLASSIFY: The document under review is classified as a \"record\". The input contains 1 reported legal flaw and 0 reported strengths. 2. MERGE: There is only one reported flaw (FLAW-1), which concerns the failure to record seal numbers and their integrity status upon gate examination. No deduplication or merging across multiple findings is required; FLAW-1 maps 1:1. 3. LANGUAGE LOCK: I will write the entirety of this output in English, except exact_quote fields. 4. CONSTRUCT: Plan the executive summary to quantify the finding (1 flaw total, categorized under incomplete seal records) and construct the final deduplicated flaw entry preserving the exact quote and regulatory references from FLAW-1.",
     "is_flawless": false
   }

2. Schemalagd nattkörning, 3 oktober 2026

   Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.

   Testfall	Körning 1
   Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

   Se motorns egna svar

   Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

   System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

   Körning 1

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: Scanning the document text reveals three short sections under 'Seal entry SE-208': 'Consignment at the gate' stating that a trailer of boxed pipe fittings arrived at the north gate; 'Seal examination' stating 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.'; and 'Release to the yard' stating 'The trailer was released to the holding yard.' 2. TRACE: Tracing the statement 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.', this represents a seal examination entry recorded by the author of the record regarding the consignment. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluating this statement against Law L1 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1', 'Examining the seals on a load'): The binding law dictates that in a record, every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The text explicitly claims that the seals were examined, but fails to provide the number of each seal and fails to state whether any seal was found unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate the finding as an omission of required details on a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM). The exact quote is 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.', located under the heading 'Seal examination'. There are no other legal rules provided, no norm conflicts, and no satisfied conditions for procedural strengths.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Inadequate seal documentation

   Förklaring

   The entry records that the seals on the trailer were examined at the gate, but omits the number of each seal and whether each seal was found unbroken, contrary to the requirements of the Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

3. Schemalagd nattkörning, 1 oktober 2026

   Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.

   Testfall	Körning 1
   Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

   Se motorns egna svar

   Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

   System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

   Körning 1

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: The document contains the statement 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' under the heading 'Seal examination' within the record 'Seal entry SE-208'. 2. TRACE: This entry asserts that the seals on the trailer (a load) were examined upon arrival at the gate. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), every seal entry in a record that states the seals on a load were examined must provide the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The document states that the seals were examined, but omits both the number of each seal and the determination of whether they were unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate one flaw identifying the omission of required seal numbers and unbroken status in the seal examination record.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Incomplete seal examination record

   Förklaring

   The record states that the seals on the trailer were examined, but fails to specify the number of each seal and whether each seal was found unbroken, as mandated by the Entry Practice Schedule.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

4. Körning efter en ändring i motorn, 30 september 2026

   Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.

   Testfall	Körning 1	Körning 2	Körning 3
   Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

   Se motorns egna svar

   Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

   System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

   Körning 1

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: Scanned the document for all statements and recordings concerning seal examinations. Found the statement under the heading 'Seal examination': 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' 2. TRACE: Traced the statement to the record author's entry regarding the arrival and examination of the trailer at the gate. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated the entry against the legal framework in 'Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1' (L1). The rule mandates that in a record, every seal entry stating that the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The author recorded that the seals were examined but omitted both the individual seal numbers and whether they were unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry represents an omission on a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM) under L1. No compliant entries exist that can be credited as strengths.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Omission of mandatory seal details

   Förklaring

   The record states that the seals on the trailer were examined, but fails to provide the number of each seal and whether each seal was found unbroken, in deviation from the requirement placed on the author by Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Körning 2

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: Scanned the document for factual statements and entries regarding seal examinations. The document contains the statement 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' under the heading 'Seal examination'. 2. TRACE: Traced the entry to verify whether the mandatory details regarding seal examination are present. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated against L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1). L1 establishes a mandatory duty on the author of a record: every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The text claims the seals were examined but provides neither the individual seal numbers nor their condition (whether unbroken). 4. SYNTHESIZE: Recorded one flaw categorized as an omission of required details on a stated claim (STATED_CLAIM), referencing L1. No procedural strengths or norm conflicts are present.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Missing seal details

   Förklaring

   The seal entry records that the trailer's seals were examined but fails to provide the number of each seal and does not state whether each seal was found unbroken, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Körning 3

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: The document contains a seal record (SE-208) recording that a trailer arrived at the north gate, seals on the trailer were examined at the gate, and the trailer was released to the holding yard. 2. TRACE: The statement 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' under heading 'Seal examination' records the examination of the load's seals. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), every seal entry in a record stating that seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The document states that the seals were examined, but omits the seal numbers and whether they were unbroken. This constitutes a stated claim omitting mandatory details. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw for incomplete seal examination record under L1. No strengths can be credited because the requirement to give both the numbers and unbroken status was not met.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Incomplete examination record

   Förklaring

   The record states that the seals on the trailer were examined at the gate, but fails to provide the number of each seal and state whether each seal was found unbroken, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja · ett påstående saknar det som krävs av det

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

5. Körning efter en ändring i motorn, 30 september 2026

   Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.

   Testfall	Körning 1	Körning 2	Körning 3
   Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

   Se motorns egna svar

   Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

   System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

   Körning 1

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: The document is a record titled 'Seal entry SE-208' containing three sections: 'Consignment at the gate' ('A trailer of boxed pipe fittings arrived at the north gate.'), 'Seal examination' ('The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.'), and 'Release to the yard' ('The trailer was released to the holding yard.'). 2. TRACE: Under 'Seal examination', the investigator/author records that 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), in a record, every seal entry stating that the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The entry mentions examination but omits both the numbers of the seals and their condition (whether found unbroken). 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of L1. Since this omission relates to an explicit claim made in the text, 'is_omission' is set to true and the claim itself is quoted. No strengths can be credited under L1 since both required elements were omitted, and no norm conflicts exist.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Missing required seal details

   Förklaring

   The seal entry records that the seals on the trailer were examined, but omits the number of each seal and does not state whether each seal was found unbroken, contrary to the requirements of Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Körning 2

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: The document contains the claim 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' under the section 'Seal examination' in 'Seal entry SE-208'. 2. TRACE: Tracing this statement reveals it is an entry in a record stating that the seals on a load (trailer) were examined. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), in a record, every seal entry that says the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and say whether it was found unbroken. The text states the examination took place but fails to provide either the seal numbers or their unbroken status. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a flaw for the omission of mandatory seal details under L1. No compliant seal entries exist to qualify as a procedural strength, and no norm conflicts are present.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Incomplete seal record

   Förklaring

   The record states that the seals on the trailer were examined, but omits the number of each seal and does not state whether each seal was found unbroken, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Körning 3

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: Scan the record for claims regarding seal examination. The record states under heading 'Seal examination': 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' 2. TRACE: The statement is recorded by the author regarding trailer SE-208 arriving at the north gate and being examined. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (Examining the seals on a load) [L1], in a record, every seal entry that says the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and say whether it was found unbroken. The author omitted both the number of each seal and the unbroken status. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Identify the failure to document seal numbers and unbroken condition as a specific omission under Law L1.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Incomplete seal examination record

   Förklaring

   The entry notes that the seals on the trailer were examined at the gate but fails to provide the number of each seal and whether each seal was found unbroken, as required for a seal examination entry.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

6. Körning efter en ändring i motorn, 30 september 2026

   Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.

   Testfall	Körning 1	Körning 2	Körning 3
   Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

   Se motorns egna svar

   Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

   System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

   Körning 1

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: The document contains the claim 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' under the heading 'Seal examination' within record 'Seal entry SE-208'. 2. TRACE: This factual statement is recorded by the author regarding the examination of trailer seals upon arrival at the north gate. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), in a record, every seal entry stating that the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and say whether it was found unbroken. The document states that the seals were examined but omits both the number of each seal and the determination of whether the seals were unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of L1 due to the omission of the required seal numbers and condition verification.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Omission of mandatory seal details

   Förklaring

   The record notes that the seals on the trailer were examined at the gate, but it fails to state the number of each seal and does not indicate whether each seal was found unbroken, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Körning 2

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: Identified the claim in the document regarding the seal examination under the heading 'Seal examination', which states: 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' 2. TRACE: Traced the statement back to the author's record entry SE-208 regarding consignment arrival and inspection. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated against Law L1 ('Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1'), which mandates that every seal entry stating seals were examined must specify the number of each seal and declare whether it was found unbroken. The entry mentions examination but fails to provide the seal numbers and unbroken status. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulated the finding as an omission flaw where the claim itself is present but lacks required statutory details. No strengths or norm conflicts are present.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Incomplete seal examination record

   Förklaring

   The seal entry states that the seals on the trailer were examined but fails to provide the number of each seal and whether each seal was found unbroken, in deviation from the requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Körning 3

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: The document contains a record entry titled 'Seal entry SE-208', with a section titled 'Seal examination' containing the statement: 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' 2. TRACE: This entry documents the examination of seals on a trailer arriving at the north gate. However, the text does not record any specific seal numbers nor does it state whether the seals were found unbroken. 3. EVALUATE: Under the binding law (Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1; id="L1"), in a record, every seal entry stating that seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The author of the record failed to provide the seal numbers and failed to record whether they were unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry violates the mandatory requirements of Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1. This omission should be recorded as a procedural flaw attached to the statement documenting the examination.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Omission of seal details

   Förklaring

   The record states that the seals on the trailer were examined at the gate, but omits the number of each seal and does not state whether each seal was found unbroken, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examinationSida: Throughout

   Utelämnande

   Ja

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

7. Körning efter en ändring i motorn, 30 september 2026

   Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.

   Testfall	Körning 1	Körning 2	Körning 3
   Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart	seal-detail-omitted Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel Inga fynd utöver facit Inget förbjudet fynd Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

   Se motorns egna svar

   Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

   System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

   Körning 1

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: Identified the factual statement regarding seal examination in the record: 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' under the heading 'Seal examination'. 2. TRACE: Traced the entry to determine if it contains the required specific details regarding seal identification numbers and condition. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated against Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1), which stipulates that every seal entry stating seals were examined must provide the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The document states that the seals were examined but omits both the seal numbers and whether they were found unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulated one omission flaw anchored on L1.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Omission of seal verification details

   Förklaring

   The record states that the seals on the trailer were examined but omits the number of each seal and fails to state whether each seal was found unbroken, contrary to the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Körning 2

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: Scan the record for all statements concerning seal examination. The text states: 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' 2. TRACE: The statement appears under the section 'Seal examination' in 'Seal entry SE-208'. 3. EVALUATE: Compare against the governing rule Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (L1). The rule mandates that in a record, every seal entry stating that the seals on a load were examined must also give the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The document states that the seals were examined, but omits the seal numbers and whether they were found unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw identifying the omission of seal numbers and seal integrity findings as required by L1.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Missing mandatory seal details

   Förklaring

   The record states that the seals on the trailer were examined, but omits both the number of each seal and whether each seal was found unbroken, failing to comply with the mandatory recording requirement under Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1.

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examinationSida: Page 1

   Utelämnande

   Ja

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade

   Körning 3

   Språk som motorn angav: English

   Motorns resonemang

   1. SCAN: The document contains the claim 'The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.' under the heading 'Seal examination' within record 'Seal entry SE-208'. 2. TRACE: The claim is asserted directly by the author of the record without further details. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (Examining the seals on a load), every seal entry in a record that states the seals on a load were examined must also provide the number of each seal and state whether it was found unbroken. The duty rests on the author of the record. The entry mentions that the seals were examined but fails to give the numbers of the seals and fails to state whether they were found unbroken. 4. SYNTHESIZE: This constitutes a legal omission under binding rule L1.

   1 brist rapporterad

   Kategori

   Missing seal examination details

   Förklaring

   The record states that the seals on the trailer were examined but fails to provide the number of each seal and whether each seal was found unbroken, as mandated by Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (Examining the seals on a load).

   Citat

   The seals on the trailer were examined at the gate.

   Var

   Under the heading Seal examinationCiterad rubrik: Seal examination

   Utelämnande

   Ja

   Åberopad regel

   L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part L, issue 1 (STATUTE)

   0 styrkor rapporterade