GRANSKA
Logga inSkapa konto
Alla testfall

Testfall · A duty owed by every entry of its kind, with and without the sentence that meets it

papers-location-unstated

Grupp
regression-unconditional-duty · Gruppversion 2
Testsvit
Testsvit controlled-regression, version 1
Evidensklass
REGRESSION

The engine reports a closure entry that says nothing about where its papers are stored as an omission with no passage to quote, and reports nothing when the same entry says where.

Testdokumenten, reglerna och facit visas på engelska, det språk de skrevs på.

Vad det här testfallet ändrar

Faktor
stated place where the original papers are stored
Nivå
absent
Jämförs med
papers-location-statedÄndringen ska ändra svaret. Ett textställe i dokumentet skiljer sig mellan de två.

The closure entry says nothing about where its papers are stored.

Dokumentet motorn fick

Exakt den text motorn fick, rad för rad.

  1. Closure entry CL-507
  2. Matter closed
  3. The complaint about night noise at the ferry ramp was closed.
  4. Complainant informed
  5. The complainant was told of the closure by telephone on 3 June 2032.

Reglerna motorn fick

Varje regel visas under en neutral beteckning i stället för sitt interna namn.

  • Regel A

    Where the original papers are stored

    Källa: Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1

    In a record, every closure entry must say where the original papers behind it are stored. Each closure entry owes this whatever its matter, without first mentioning papers at all. The duty rests on the author of the record.

Facit

Skrevs ner innan motorn kördes. papers-location-unstated-truth

The entry names no place for any papers under any heading, so the duty is owed and unmet with no passage the omission can be anchored on.

Facit är uttömmande: varje fynd som inte står som förväntat räknas som fel.

Förväntade fynd

  • BristUtelämnandeFynd papers-location-absent

    The closure entry does not say where its original papers are stored, which the rule requires of every closure entry.

    Ska förankras i
    Förankras inte i något textställe, eftersom dokumentet aldrig nämner steget
    Ska hänvisa till
    Regel A
    Kontrolleras i
    granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten

Förbjudna fynd

Fel svar, nedskrivna i förväg.

  • StyrkaFynd notice-praised-as-locating-papers

    Crediting the line on how the complainant was told for saying where the papers are stored when it says nothing of the kind.

    Ska förankras i
    The complainant was told of the closure by telephone on 3 June 2032.
    Ska hänvisa till
    Regel A
    Kontrolleras i
    granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten

Vad den blinda läsaren svarade

En AI-läsare fick det här dokumentet och dess regler, men inte facit, och svarade på egen hand. Jämför svaret med facit ovan.

  • Överens med facitGemini, 5 oktober 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-01
    • BristUtelämnandeRegel A

Kritisk granskning av facit

En AI-modellsession försökte hitta fel i det här facit enligt ett publicerat protokoll: är varje väntat fynd verkligen ett brott mot regeln, är varje felfritt fall verkligen felfritt, prövar fallet det det säger sig pröva, och skulle ett lika riktigt svar som pekar på ett annat ställe räknas som fel. Den tittade inte på motorns resultat först. Varje invändning visas med hur den avgjordes. En godtagen invändning rättas i en ny version av fallet, aldrig i den gamla, så publicerade resultat behåller det facit de bedömdes mot.

Ingen kritisk granskning av det här facit finns registrerad.

Testets instruktion till granskaren

Testkonfigurationen gav AI-granskaren den här instruktionen vid sidan av reglerna. Det är testets egen instruktion. Produktionens systemprompt visas inte.

You read one document and apply only the rules supplied to you in the legal framework, exactly as each rule is written. Report every place where the document does not meet a supplied rule, and apply what a supplied rule says about how a record that meets it is to be recorded. Quote each passage exactly as it appears. Do not apply a rule that was not supplied, and do not rely on any knowledge of a legal system.

Vem som skrev och läste det här testfallet

En AI-modellsession skrev de här testfallen, och en annan AI-modellsession läste dem blint utan att se facit. Ingen människa har granskat dem.

Skrevs
, registrerat som Claude Project thread session for #3082
Modellfamilj som skrev det
Claude
Varför det skrevs
Authored for #2323 as new REGRESSION material in the outcome shapes of the controlled-pilot suite, sharing none of its text. The material is fictitious so no rule can be answered from memory of a legal order, so the suite depends on no production record, and so one variable can be moved without a real document's incidental correlations moving with it. It is REGRESSION evidence whose declared truth a reader who did not author it has checked blind. Version 2 corrects version 1 for #3082: a blind reader placed the missing statement of where the papers are stored under the entry's closing note, a defensible home the key did not allow. Version 2 drops that section and gives the stated side's sentence a heading of its own.

Granskning

Skrivna av en AI-modellsession: Claude.

  • Blind läsning, Gemini, 5 oktober 2026: 1 av 2 överens

    registrerat som gemini-2.5-pro (Vertex europe-west1), blind read

    1 oenighet med facit

    • Punkt item-02

      The reader found the duty met by the sentence that says where the papers are stored, as declared, but credited that sentence as a strength; the key declares the entry compliant and credits nothing.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Reader over-credits: doing what the rule requires, and no more, is compliance, not a strength. Kept as declared.

    Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall

AI-modeller skrev och granskade de här testfallen, som anges ovan. Ingen människa har granskat dem. Varje oenighet mellan en AI-granskare och facit publiceras här.

Fingeravtryck

SHA-256-hashvärden som en läsare kan jämföra med en publicerad körnings rapport.

Dokument
1509e407bc17990d3ef50ffc20ccf600dc31a31c66aa255af6eae9b453b19620
Dokumentmall
aa450261fa4e8225c1db9e713ace8affc46b4c8bf412c4abd533b31e8276db0e
Regel A
9179015ff26a2a0761ed1900dcb9a8b4361adb49cc61403b42fc4ab93235e471

Resultat i publicerade körningar

Senaste först. Varje kolumn är en körning av det här testfallet.

  1. Mätkörning med releasedesignen, ingen release,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3Körning 4Körning 5
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record documenting a closure entry under the heading 'Closure entry CL-507'. It consists of three short sections: 'Matter closed' (stating that the complaint regarding night noise at the ferry ramp was closed), 'Closing steps' (stating that the complainant was told of the closure by telephone on 3 June 2032), and 'Closing note' (stating that the matter needs no further work). 2. TRACE: Tracing the required procedural elements for closure entries in records under the applicable legal framework. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1), in a record, every closure entry must say where the original papers behind it are stored, regardless of its matter and without first mentioning papers. The duty rests on the author of the record. Evaluating the document shows that there is no indication or statement whatsoever of where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The total absence of the required statement regarding the storage location of the original papers constitutes an omission (ABSENT_STEP) under Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1. There are no other applicable legal provisions, norm conflicts, or compliant procedural strengths supported by the provided framework.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry does not state where the original papers behind it are stored, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    Under the heading Closure entry CL-507Citerad rubrik: Closure entry CL-507Sida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja · det krävda steget saknas i dokumentet
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record containing a closure entry (CL-507) concerning a complaint about night noise at a ferry ramp. It contains entries on matter closure, closing steps, and a closing note. 2. TRACE: Under L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1), in a record, every closure entry must state where the original papers behind it are stored. 3. EVALUATE: Reviewing the entire text of Closure entry CL-507 reveals no mention or indication of where the original papers behind the entry are stored. This constitutes a procedural omission of a mandatory statutory requirement placed on the author of the record. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a flaw identifying the absent step regarding the failure to record the storage location of the original papers pursuant to L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry fails to state where the original papers behind it are stored, contrary to the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    In the record under the heading Closure entry CL-507Citerad rubrik: Closure entry CL-507Sida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja · det krävda steget saknas i dokumentet
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document constitutes a closure entry designated 'Closure entry CL-507' within a record, setting out that a complaint regarding night noise at the ferry ramp was closed, that the complainant was notified by telephone on 3 June 2032, and that the matter needs no further work. 2. TRACE: The entry is authored as a formal record of closure for the complaint. 3. EVALUATE: Pursuant to Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1), every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored, irrespective of the matter and without requiring a prior mention of papers. A review of the entire entry reveals no mention or indication of where the original papers are stored. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The entry completely omits the mandatory storage location required by L1. As this is an entirely omitted procedural requirement with no stated claim to quote, it is classified as an omission with ABSENT_STEP evidence. No other rules are present in the legal framework, so no strengths or norm conflicts exist.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of required storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry fails to state where the original papers behind it are stored, in non-compliance with Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1, which mandates that every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    In the closure entry under Closure entry CL-507Citerad rubrik: Closure entry CL-507Sida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja · det krävda steget saknas i dokumentet
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 4

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record containing a closure entry labeled 'Closure entry CL-507' with sections 'Matter closed', 'Closing steps', and 'Closing note'. It records the closure of a complaint regarding night noise at the ferry ramp, notes that the complainant was informed by telephone on 3 June 2032, and states that the matter needs no further work. 2. TRACE: The investigator/author documents the closure steps and closing note, but nowhere in the record is there any mention or indication of where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored. 3. EVALUATE: According to the binding legal framework (Law L1: Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1), every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored, irrespective of its subject matter, placing this duty on the author of the record. The document completely omits this required step/information. 4. SYNTHESIZE: An omission flaw is identified under Law L1. Because the document contains no statement at all regarding the storage location of the original papers, this constitutes an ABSENT_STEP omission with exact_quote set to null. No conflicting norms or valid procedural strengths under the provided legal framework exist.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Mandatory record omission
    Förklaring
    Under Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1, every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored, regardless of the matter. The closure entry CL-507 completely omits any statement specifying the storage location of the underlying original papers.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    Under the heading Closure entry CL-507Citerad rubrik: Closure entry CL-507Sida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja · det krävda steget saknas i dokumentet
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 5

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a closure entry titled 'Closure entry CL-507' under document type 'record'. It contains entries under 'Matter closed', 'Closing steps', and 'Closing note', recording that a complaint about night noise at the ferry ramp was closed, the complainant was informed on 3 June 2032, and no further work is needed. 2. TRACE: The text contains no statement or reference regarding where the original papers behind the entry are stored. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1), every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored, irrespective of its subject matter, placing this duty on the record's author. The document contains no statement fulfilling this mandatory requirement. 4. SYNTHESIZE: An omission flaw (ABSENT_STEP) must be recorded for the missing storage location of the original papers under Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1. No other rules or guidelines are provided, so no strengths or norm conflicts are identified.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of mandatory storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry does not state where the original papers behind it are stored, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    In the closure entry Closure entry CL-507Citerad rubrik: Closure entry CL-507Sida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja · det krävda steget saknas i dokumentet
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  2. Schemalagd nattkörning,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren
    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The provided document is a closure entry titled 'Closure entry CL-507' under the document type 'record'. It contains sections detailing that the complaint was closed ('Matter closed'), that the complainant was notified by phone on 3 June 2032 ('Closing steps'), and that the matter needs no further work ('Closing note'). 2. TRACE: Checking the applicable legal framework, Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1) imposes a binding duty on the author of a record that 'every closure entry must say where the original papers behind it are stored. Each closure entry owes this whatever its matter, without first mentioning papers at all.' 3. EVALUATE: The document contains no statement or mention indicating where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored. This constitutes an omission of a mandatory procedural requirement established by L1. Because there is no passage or claim in the text regarding storage location, this is an absent step (ABSENT_STEP). 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate the identified flaw under L1 with omission_evidence set to ABSENT_STEP and exact_quote set to null. No norm conflicts or strengths supported by the legal context were identified.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of records storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry does not state where the original papers behind it are stored, failing to meet the requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 that every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    Under the heading Closure entry CL-507, the record does not state where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored.Citerad rubrik: Closure entry CL-507Sida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja · det krävda steget saknas i dokumentet
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  3. Schemalagd nattkörning,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren
    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record containing a closure entry (CL-507) regarding a complaint about night noise at a ferry ramp. It states that the complaint was closed, the complainant was informed by telephone on 3 June 2032, and the matter needs no further work. 2. TRACE: Under the provided legal framework, Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (<law id="L1">) mandates that every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored, regardless of matter, placing the duty on the author. 3. EVALUATE: Examining the closure entry CL-507, there is no mention of where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored. This violates the mandatory requirement of Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1. 4. SYNTHESIZE: An omission flaw is formulated under L1. Because the document contains no passage addressing the storage location of original papers, this constitutes an ABSENT_STEP with exact_quote set to null.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry fails to specify where the original papers behind it are stored, contrary to Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1, which requires every closure entry in a record to state where the original papers behind it are stored.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    In the closure entry under the heading Closure entry CL-507Citerad rubrik: Closure entry CL-507Sida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja · det krävda steget saknas i dokumentet
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  4. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record containing a closure entry ('Closure entry CL-507') concerning a complaint about night noise at a ferry ramp. It contains sections 'Matter closed', 'Closing steps' (recording a telephone call to the complainant on 3 June 2032), and 'Closing note' ('The matter needs no further work.'). 2. TRACE: The text was examined for any statement indicating where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored. No such statement exists anywhere in the record. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1), every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored, regardless of the matter and without first needing to mention papers. The document completely lacks this mandatory statement. 4. SYNTHESIZE: One flaw is identified representing the complete omission of the required storage location of original papers (ABSENT_STEP). No strengths can be grounded in the provided legal framework, and no norm conflicts exist.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry fails to state where the original papers behind it are stored, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    Throughout the closure entrySida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja · det krävda steget saknas i dokumentet
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a closure entry titled 'Closure entry CL-507' in a record. It records the closing of a complaint regarding night noise at the ferry ramp, notes telephone notification to the complainant on 3 June 2032, and states that the matter needs no further work. It contains no statement regarding where original papers are stored. 2. TRACE: The document's entries reflect closure actions and notes. There is no mention or trace of original documentation, storage location, or filing repository. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (id: L1), in a record, every closure entry must say where the original papers behind it are stored, regardless of matter and without needing to mention papers first, placing this duty on the author. The provided closure entry completely omits the storage location of the original papers behind it. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw for the absent procedural step requiring the storage location of original papers in the closure entry pursuant to L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry fails to state where the original papers behind it are stored, contrary to the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    Under the heading Closure entry CL-507Citerad rubrik: Closure entry CL-507Sida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja · det krävda steget saknas i dokumentet
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a closure entry (CL-507) within a record regarding a complaint about night noise at a ferry ramp. It states that the matter was closed, the complainant was informed by telephone on 3 June 2032, and the matter requires no further work. 2. TRACE: The entry contains no statement or reference regarding where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1), every closure entry in a record must explicitly state where the original papers behind it are stored, irrespective of its matter and without needing prior mention of papers. The document entirely omits this required procedural and recording step. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate one flaw object indicating the total omission (ABSENT_STEP) of the storage location of the original papers as mandated by L1. No norm conflicts or legal strengths mapped to provided snippets exist.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry fails to state where the original papers behind it are stored, in violation of Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1, which mandates that every closure entry in a record must state the storage location of the underlying original papers.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    Throughout the closure entrySida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja · det krävda steget saknas i dokumentet
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  5. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskaren2 olika uppsättningar fynd över körningarna
    • papers-location-absent Brist: inte hittad, men regeln nämndes i ett annat fynd
    1 oväntad brist
    • Hänvisade till: Regel A

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 1 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Vad varierade mellan körningarna

    Fynd som vissa körningar gav och andra inte. Varje länk går till motorns svar i den körningen.

    Endast granskaren

    • Förväntat fynd papers-location-absent: Brist, hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel I: Körning 2, Körning 3
    • Förväntat fynd papers-location-absent: Brist, inte hittad, men regeln nämndes i ett annat fynd I: Körning 1
    • Oväntad brist. Hänvisade till: Regel A. På rad 3 i dokumentet I: Körning 1
    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record containing a closure entry (CL-507) that states under 'Matter closed' that 'The complaint about night noise at the ferry ramp was closed.', notes under 'Closing steps' that the complainant was informed on 3 June 2032, and records under 'Closing note' that no further work is needed. 2. TRACE: The entry records the formal closure of the complaint matter by the author. However, across all sections ('Closure entry CL-507', 'Matter closed', 'Closing steps', 'Closing note'), there is no statement specifying where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1), every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored, regardless of the matter and without needing to mention papers beforehand. The duty is placed directly on the author of the record. The document completely omits this required information. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a flaw identifying the omission of the storage location of the original papers in the closure entry, anchored to L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry omits stating where the original papers behind it are stored, violating the mandatory requirement in Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 that every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored.
    Citat
    The complaint about night noise at the ferry ramp was closed.
    Var
    Under the heading Matter closedCiterad rubrik: Matter closed
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record consisting of a closure entry ('Closure entry CL-507') containing sections 'Matter closed', 'Closing steps', and 'Closing note'. The text records that a noise complaint was closed, the complainant was informed by telephone on 3 June 2032, and no further work is needed. 2. TRACE: The document was evaluated against the legal framework provided. Specifically, Law L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1) governs closure entries within records. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1, every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored, regardless of the matter and without first mentioning papers. The duty rests on the author of the record. The document completely omits any statement indicating where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored. 4. SYNTHESIZE: This constitutes a procedural omission of a mandatory statutory recording requirement under Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1). There are no conflicting norms and no compliant procedural strengths to cite from the provided legal texts.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry omits a statement of where the original papers behind it are stored, which is made mandatory for records by Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    Under the heading Closure entry CL-507Citerad rubrik: Closure entry CL-507Sida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record titled 'Closure entry CL-507'. It records the closure of a complaint regarding night noise at the ferry ramp, notes that the complainant was informed by telephone on 3 June 2032, and concludes with a closing note stating that the matter needs no further work. 2. TRACE: The document contains statements regarding closure, notification, and case completion. However, looking at the legal framework, Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1) mandates that every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored. Scanning the text reveals no statement or reference whatsoever to the storage location of the original papers. 3. EVALUATE: Comparing the document against L1, L1 establishes an unconditional statutory duty resting on the author of the record: 'In a record, every closure entry must say where the original papers behind it are stored. Each closure entry owes this whatever its matter, without first mentioning papers at all.' The document completely omits this required element. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate the finding as a procedural omission under L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of required information
    Förklaring
    The closure entry omits the mandatory statement specifying where the original papers behind it are stored, as required by Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    Throughout the closure entrySida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  6. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: Scanned the document 'Closure entry CL-507'. The document contains details regarding the closure of a complaint about night noise at the ferry ramp, closing steps taken on 3 June 2032, and a closing note stating that the matter needs no further work. 2. TRACE: Traced the closure entry against the requirements for records. The text provides closing information but completely omits any mention of the storage location of the original papers behind the entry. 3. EVALUATE: Evaluated against L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1), which mandates that in a record, every closure entry must state where the original papers behind it are stored, placing the duty on the author of the record regardless of the matter. The document completely fails to specify where the original papers are stored. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulated the flaw as an omission of the mandatory statement of storage location for original papers under L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry omits stating where the original papers behind it are stored, contrary to Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1, which requires every closure entry in a record to specify the storage location of the underlying original papers.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    In the closure entry Closure entry CL-507Citerad rubrik: Closure entry CL-507Sida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The record consists of a closure entry ('Closure entry CL-507') containing sections 'Matter closed', 'Closing steps', and 'Closing note'. It records the closure of a complaint regarding ferry ramp noise, a telephone notification on 3 June 2032, and a concluding note that no further work is required. 2. TRACE: The document is categorized under document_context as a 'record'. The author of the record has authored closure entry CL-507. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1), every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored. The duty is placed directly upon the author of the record. The document completely lacks any indication or statement regarding where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The document omits a mandatory procedural requirement imposed by L1. As this is a complete omission of a required element with no specific text passage asserting it, is_omission is set to true and exact_quote is null.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry fails to state where the original papers behind it are stored, in violation of Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1, which requires every closure entry in a record to specify the storage location of the original papers.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    Throughout the closure entrySida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a closure entry (CL-507) in a record regarding a closed complaint about night noise at a ferry ramp. It contains sections 'Closure entry CL-507', 'Matter closed', 'Closing steps', and 'Closing note'. 2. TRACE: The entry notes that the matter was closed, telephone communication occurred on 3 June 2032, and no further work is needed. However, there is no mention anywhere of where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1), in a record, every closure entry must say where the original papers behind it are stored, regardless of its matter and without first mentioning papers at all. This mandatory duty rests on the author of the record. The document completely omits this required statement. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw for the complete omission of the storage location of the original papers under Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1).

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of required storage location
    Förklaring
    Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 requires that every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored, but the record completely omits this required information.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    Throughout the closure entrySida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

  7. Körning efter en ändring i motorn,

    Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1Körning 2Körning 3
    Bedömt mot version 1Endast granskarenSamma fynd i varje körning
    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    • papers-location-absent Brist: hittad, på rätt textställe och med rätt regel

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record containing a closure entry titled 'Closure entry CL-507'. The entry records that a complaint regarding ferry ramp night noise was closed, notes communication with the complainant on 3 June 2032, and concludes that no further work is needed. It does not state where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored. 2. TRACE: Tracing the content of the closure entry reveals no mention or indication of the physical or digital storage location of the original underlying papers. 3. EVALUATE: According to Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1), every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored, regardless of the matter and without requiring prior mention of papers. The author of the record failed to include this required information. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a single flaw for the omission of the mandatory statement regarding where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored, anchored to L1.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Procedural omission
    Förklaring
    The closure entry does not state where the original papers behind it are stored, which is mandatory for every closure entry in a record under Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    In Closure entry CL-507Citerad rubrik: Closure entry CL-507Sida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 2

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record titled 'Closure entry CL-507'. It records the closure of a complaint regarding night noise at the ferry ramp under 'Matter closed', notes telephone communication with the complainant on 3 June 2032 under 'Closing steps', and states 'The matter needs no further work' under 'Closing note'. 2. TRACE: Scanning the entire closure entry reveals that no statement is made regarding where the original papers behind the closure entry are stored. 3. EVALUATE: Under Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (Where the original papers are stored) [L1], every closure entry in a record must state where the original papers behind it are stored, regardless of its subject matter and without needing to mention papers beforehand. The document completely omits this mandatory information. 4. SYNTHESIZE: An omission flaw must be raised against L1 for failing to record the storage location of the original papers behind the closure entry. No strengths are present under the provided legal framework as no other legal provisions are provided or complied with, and no norm conflicts exist.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Missing storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry fails to state where the original papers behind it are stored, which is mandatory for every closure entry in a record under Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (Where the original papers are stored).
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    In the closure entry under Closure entry CL-507Citerad rubrik: Closure entry CL-507Sida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

    Körning 3

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document is a record consisting of Closure entry CL-507, noting that a complaint regarding night noise at the ferry ramp was closed, recording telephone communication with the complainant on 3 June 2032, and providing a closing note. It does not include any information regarding where the original papers behind it are stored. 2. TRACE: Under the governing legal framework, Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (L1), every closure entry in a record must explicitly state where the original papers behind it are stored, with the duty placed on the author of the record. 3. EVALUATE: Comparing Closure entry CL-507 against L1, the document completely omits the mandatory statement specifying where the underlying original papers are stored. 4. SYNTHESIZE: Formulate a flaw for the omission of the storage location of original papers pursuant to L1. There are no other rules in the framework, so no norm conflicts or strengths are identified.

    1 brist rapporterad

    Kategori
    Omission of storage location
    Förklaring
    The closure entry fails to state where the original papers behind it are stored, which is mandatory for every closure entry in a record under Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1.
    Citat
    Inget citat
    Var
    Throughout the closure entrySida: Throughout
    Utelämnande
    Ja
    Åberopad regel
    L1 · Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1 (STATUTE)

    0 styrkor rapporterade

Kontroll: motorn körd med fel regler

Visas skild från resultaten. Motorn fick ett annat falls regler, så varje fynd nedan är ett fynd mot regler som inte gäller det här dokumentet.

  1. Det här testfallet i varje körning av omgången.
    TestfallKörning 1
    Bedömt mot version 2Endast granskaren
    • papers-location-absent Brist: missad

    Inga fynd utöver facit

    Inget förbjudet fynd

    Citat: 0 ordagrant, 0 påhittat, 0 obestämbart

    Se motorns egna svar

    Det här är motorns egna svar, på den engelska den skrev dem, visade precis som de kom tillbaka och oredigerade. Upprepningarna står sida vid sida, så att du själv kan se hur formuleringarna varierar även när det poängsatta resultatet är detsamma.

    System- och användarprompterna som motorn fick publiceras inte: de hör till produkten, inte till testet. Dokumentet, reglerna och instruktionen som testet gav visas ovan.

    Körning 1

    Språk som motorn angav: English

    Motorns resonemang

    1. SCAN: The document consists of a closure entry (CL-507) stating that a complaint regarding night noise at the ferry ramp was closed, and noting that the complainant was notified of the closure by telephone on 3 June 2032. 2. TRACE: The text records the administrative closure of a noise complaint and subsequent telephone communication with the complainant. 3. EVALUATE: The provided legal framework contains only one binding law, L1 (Entry Practice Schedule, part K, issue 1), which stipulates that every repair entry describing a fault as cured must name the person who checked the cure on site. The present document is a complaint closure entry, not a repair entry describing a fault as cured. Therefore, the mandatory condition of L1 is not engaged. 4. SYNTHESIZE: The document does not breach the provided rule, resulting in zero identified flaws. Furthermore, because no rule in the legal framework directly governs or certifies the actions taken regarding closure or complainant notification, no strengths can be mapped to the provided framework.

    0 brister rapporterade

    0 styrkor rapporterade

Tidigare versioner av det här testfallet

En rättad grupp publiceras bredvid den version som tidigare resultat bedömdes mot.

Gruppversion 1

Vad det här testfallet ändrar

Faktor
stated place where the original papers are stored
Nivå
absent
Jämförs med
papers-location-statedÄndringen ska ändra svaret. Ett textställe i dokumentet skiljer sig mellan de två.

The closure entry says nothing about where its papers are stored.

Dokumentet motorn fick

Exakt den text motorn fick, rad för rad.

  1. Closure entry CL-507
  2. Matter closed
  3. The complaint about night noise at the ferry ramp was closed.
  4. Closing steps
  5. The complainant was told of the closure by telephone on 3 June 2032.
  6. Closing note
  7. The matter needs no further work.

Reglerna motorn fick

Varje regel visas under en neutral beteckning i stället för sitt interna namn.

  • Regel A

    Where the original papers are stored

    Källa: Entry Practice Schedule, part T, issue 1

    In a record, every closure entry must say where the original papers behind it are stored. Each closure entry owes this whatever its matter, without first mentioning papers at all. The duty rests on the author of the record.

Facit

Skrevs ner innan motorn kördes. papers-location-unstated-truth

The entry names no place for any papers under any heading, so the duty is owed and unmet with no passage the omission can be anchored on.

Facit är uttömmande: varje fynd som inte står som förväntat räknas som fel.

Förväntade fynd

  • BristUtelämnandeFynd papers-location-absent

    The closure entry does not say where its original papers are stored, which the rule requires of every closure entry.

    Ska förankras i
    Förankras inte i något textställe, eftersom dokumentet aldrig nämner steget
    Ska hänvisa till
    Regel A
    Kontrolleras i
    granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten

Förbjudna fynd

Fel svar, nedskrivna i förväg.

  • StyrkaFynd closing-note-praised-as-locating-papers

    Crediting the closing note for saying where the papers are stored when it says nothing of the kind.

    Ska förankras i
    The matter needs no further work.
    Ska hänvisa till
    Regel A
    Kontrolleras i
    granskarens eget utfall, den levererade rapporten

Vad den blinda läsaren svarade

En AI-läsare fick det här dokumentet och dess regler, men inte facit, och svarade på egen hand. Jämför svaret med facit ovan.

  • Överens med facitClaude, 23 september 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-22
    • BristUtelämnandeRegel A
  • Inte överens med facitGemini, 4 oktober 2026Punkt i läsarens underlag item-06
    • BristUtelämnandeRegel A

      Placeras under Closing note

Kritisk granskning av facit

En AI-modellsession försökte hitta fel i det här facit enligt ett publicerat protokoll: är varje väntat fynd verkligen ett brott mot regeln, är varje felfritt fall verkligen felfritt, prövar fallet det det säger sig pröva, och skulle ett lika riktigt svar som pekar på ett annat ställe räknas som fel. Den tittade inte på motorns resultat först. Varje invändning visas med hur den avgjordes. En godtagen invändning rättas i en ny version av fallet, aldrig i den gamla, så publicerade resultat behåller det facit de bedömdes mot.

Granskning av Claude, 4 oktober 2026

  • Invändning besvaradFörankringRegel Ap1 · papers-location-absent

    The target has no quote. An engine that anchors the omission on the closing note, "The matter needs no further work.", where the statement would naturally sit, is scored as a miss and an unexpected flaw.

    Facit står kvar

    The production prompt tells the engine that a document lacking a required step altogether reports it as an omission with no quote. Anchoring it on an unrelated sentence departs from that contract, which the suite settled (#2081).

  • Invändning besvaradRiktighetRegel Ap2 · papers-location-unstated-truth

    A complaint closed by telephone may have no original papers at all, in which case there is nothing to say where they are.

    Facit står kvar

    Rule A is owed by every closure entry "whatever its matter", and the matter began as a complaint, which the entry records. If there were no papers, the entry would have to say so; it says nothing.

  • Invändning besvaradSvårighetRegel Ap3 · papers-location-presence

    Gäller hela gruppen av fall

    Rule A's second sentence tells the reader the duty is owed "without first mentioning papers at all", so it states the very property the family tests.

    Facit står kvar

    Unlike an exemption naming a case, the sentence states the rule's scope as a real rule would and does not settle either variant: whether the entry says where the papers are still decides the contrast.

Testets instruktion till granskaren

Testkonfigurationen gav AI-granskaren den här instruktionen vid sidan av reglerna. Det är testets egen instruktion. Produktionens systemprompt visas inte.

You read one document and apply only the rules supplied to you in the legal framework, exactly as each rule is written. Report every place where the document does not meet a supplied rule, and apply what a supplied rule says about how a record that meets it is to be recorded. Quote each passage exactly as it appears. Do not apply a rule that was not supplied, and do not rely on any knowledge of a legal system.

Vem som skrev och läste det här testfallet

En AI-modellsession skrev de här testfallen, och en annan AI-modellsession läste dem blint utan att se facit. Ingen människa har granskat dem.

Skrevs
, registrerat som Verkstaden implementer (Claude Local), #2323
Modellfamilj som skrev det
Claude
Varför det skrevs
Authored for #2323 as new REGRESSION material in the outcome shapes of the controlled-pilot suite, sharing none of its text. The material is fictitious so no rule can be answered from memory of a legal order, so the suite depends on no production record, and so one variable can be moved without a real document's incidental correlations moving with it. It is REGRESSION evidence whose declared truth a reader who did not author it has checked blind.

Granskning

Skrivna av en AI-modellsession: Claude.

  • Blind läsning, Claude, 23 september 2026: 22 av 22 överens

    registrerat som Verkstaden orchestrator session (Claude Opus 5.5), blind read

    Ingen oenighet med facit.

    Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall

  • Blind läsning, Gemini, 4 oktober 2026: 19 av 22 överens

    registrerat som gemini-2.5-pro (Vertex europe-west1), blind read

    3 oenigheter med facit

    • Punkt item-06

      The reader found the closure entry's missing statement of where its papers are stored, as declared, but placed it under the "Closing note" heading; the key places it under no section.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Genuinely ambiguous: the rule attaches the duty to the whole entry, but a closing note is a natural home for it, and the packet does not say which. Kept as declared; #3082 sharpens the case.

    • Punkt item-07

      The reader agreed nothing is due for the sample run from a tap, but gave the reason as a condition not triggered; the key declares the sample out of the rule's scope.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Genuinely ambiguous: the packet names the four reasons without defining them, and the rule's wording reads both as a scope limit and as an unmet condition. Kept as declared; #3083 sharpens the reasons.

    • Punkt item-17

      The reader found the levy charged from a figure with no named document, as declared, but quoted the sentence that sets the levy; the key anchors the flaw on the sentence that states the figure.

      Hur den avgjordes

      Reader wrong: the rule's duty attaches to the figure ("a figure whose document is not named"), and the packet anchors an unsupported claim on the claim itself, which here is the figure, not the charge set from it.

    Se vad den blinda läsaren svarade i varje testfall

  • Kritisk granskning, Claude, 4 oktober 2026: 0 invändningar

    registrerat som Claude Project thread session for #3049, adversarial critique

    Ingen oenighet med facit.

AI-modeller skrev och granskade de här testfallen, som anges ovan. Ingen människa har granskat dem. Varje oenighet mellan en AI-granskare och facit publiceras här.

Fingeravtryck

SHA-256-hashvärden som en läsare kan jämföra med en publicerad körnings rapport.

Dokument
692f4cad59486f1923b934ebe4f752574d84e41a3e016633146230e27f293c03
Dokumentmall
8e8453d2c13349db47bc8a8625e3526784a24d3f3bd807ef19494c25263f6c55
Regel A
9179015ff26a2a0761ed1900dcb9a8b4361adb49cc61403b42fc4ab93235e471